| |
ETSI's Bug Tracker |
| Anonymous | Login | Signup for local Mantis account | 05-05-2024 16:17 IST |  |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Monitor project |
| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
| 0007312 | SECURITY | TSS&TP | public | 14-01-2016 10:26 | 13-12-2016 13:34 | ||||
| Reporter | haddads | ||||||||
| Assigned To | Denis Filatov | ||||||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried | ||||
| Status | resolved | Resolution | no change required | ||||||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||
| Product Version | |||||||||
| Target Version | Next Version | Fixed in Version | |||||||
| Summary | 0007312: [TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_05_04_BO] Reference | ||||||||
| Description | Section 7.1 of 103 097-2 does not give any restriction on certificate chains. Shouldn't an other reference be given ? | ||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||||
 Relationships |
|
 Relationships |
|
Notes |
|
|
(0014412) Denis Filatov (administrator) 13-12-2016 13:34 |
yes, it gives: "it shall include a signer_info field of type certificate_chain containing the currently used authorization ticket and authorization authority certificate immediately in its next CAM", so at least 2. |
|
Notes |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 14-01-2016 10:26 | haddads | New Issue | |
| 14-01-2016 10:26 | haddads | Status | new => assigned |
| 14-01-2016 10:26 | haddads | Assigned To | => Denis Filatov |
| 13-12-2016 13:34 | Denis Filatov | Note Added: 0014412 | |
| 13-12-2016 13:34 | Denis Filatov | Status | assigned => resolved |
| 13-12-2016 13:34 | Denis Filatov | Resolution | open => no change required |
|
Issue History |
| MantisBT 1.2.14 [^] Copyright © 2000 - 2024 MantisBT Team |
 |