ETSI's Bug Tracker |
Anonymous | Login | Signup for local Mantis account | 01-06-2024 22:38 IST |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Monitor project |
View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
0006976 | SECURITY | Base Spec | public | 26-03-2015 12:53 | 24-11-2016 15:26 | ||||
Reporter | Denis Filatov | ||||||||
Assigned To | Sebastian Muellers | ||||||||
Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | have not tried | ||||
Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | ||||||
Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||
Product Version | |||||||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||||||
Summary | 0006976: Do we need certificates in CAM each second | ||||||||
Description | I want to raise again the discussion do we really need to send the certificate each second? The certificate can be received much faster using the certificate request mechanism than unattended sending. All devices must send either CAM or beacon, so all devices are capable to request the certificate if they don't have one. To reduce the rate we can add a limitation that certificate should not be sent more often then once per second. | ||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
Attached Files | |||||||||
Notes | |
(0014360) Sebastian Muellers (administrator) 24-11-2016 15:26 |
understood but no changes allowed by WG |
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
26-03-2015 12:53 | Denis Filatov | New Issue | |
24-11-2016 15:26 | Sebastian Muellers | Note Added: 0014360 | |
24-11-2016 15:26 | Sebastian Muellers | Status | new => closed |
24-11-2016 15:26 | Sebastian Muellers | Assigned To | => Sebastian Muellers |
24-11-2016 15:26 | Sebastian Muellers | Resolution | open => no change required |
MantisBT 1.2.14 [^] Copyright © 2000 - 2024 MantisBT Team |