ETSI's Bug Tracker |
Anonymous | Login | Signup for local Mantis account | 03-05-2024 04:15 IST |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Monitor project |
View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
0006714 | Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language | Technical | public | 08-04-2014 14:49 | 23-09-2014 15:25 | ||||
Reporter | Tomas Urban | ||||||||
Assigned To | Gyorgy Rethy | ||||||||
Priority | urgent | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | N/A | ||||
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||||||
Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||
Product Version | v4.5.1 (published 2013-04) | ||||||||
Target Version | v4.6.2 (interim 2014) | Fixed in Version | v4.6.2 (interim 2014) | ||||||
Summary | 0006714: Expansion of LHS in case of uninitialized constructive variables | ||||||||
Description | It might be obvious what happens if the LHS of an assignment contains a reference to a record field and the record itself is uninitialized or omitted, i.e. that the record value is created, the RHS is assigned to the referenced field and all remaining fields become uninitialized (unless "implicit omit" is involved). However, this kind of rule is missing from the core language specification and should be added for values of the following constructive types: record, set, record of, set of, array, union. | ||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
Clause Reference(s) | 6.2 | ||||||||
Source (company - Author) | STF 478 | ||||||||
Attached Files | CR6714_v1.docx [^] (31,945 bytes) 09-04-2014 10:32 CR6714_v2.docx [^] (33,814 bytes) 10-04-2014 13:10 CR6714_v3.docx [^] (37,004 bytes) 01-08-2014 14:41 CR6714_v4.docx [^] (39,396 bytes) 11-08-2014 10:15 | ||||||||
Relationships | ||||||||||||||||
|
Notes | |
(0011967) Tomas Urban (developer) 09-04-2014 10:35 |
Proposal created. It formalizes the common convension for referencing fields of omitted and uninitialized values. Please check. |
(0011994) Jens Grabowski (manager) 10-04-2014 11:47 |
What means: - implicitly or explicitly set to "implicit omit" - implicitly or explicitly set to "explicit omit" The values "implicit omit" and "explicit omit" are unknown to me. In addition, an explicitly set to "implicit omit" should become an "explicit omit" and vice versa. |
(0012001) Tomas Urban (developer) 10-04-2014 13:12 |
Changed the wording: implicitly or explicitly set to -> equal to Please check. |
(0012073) Jens Grabowski (manager) 16-06-2014 09:02 |
Ok, from my point of view. |
(0012210) Gyorgy Rethy (reporter) 01-08-2014 14:40 |
Text related to expansion of dot/index notations has been amended to unambiguously descibe the cases, when records/sets/recordofs/setofs/unions are mixing along the expansion. Pls. review CR6714_v3.docx. Changed text is identified by yellow background to allow quick review. |
(0012214) Tomas Urban (developer) 11-08-2014 10:19 |
I like the last changes in the proposal and I have no objection against them. I only made a small correction in the rules on union values, adding set of and array to the list of types that can be expanded. |
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
08-04-2014 14:49 | Tomas Urban | New Issue | |
08-04-2014 14:49 | Tomas Urban | Status | new => assigned |
08-04-2014 14:49 | Tomas Urban | Assigned To | => Tomas Urban |
09-04-2014 09:18 | Tomas Urban | Relationship added | related to 0006700 |
09-04-2014 10:31 | Tomas Urban | Relationship added | related to 0006715 |
09-04-2014 10:32 | Tomas Urban | Assigned To | Tomas Urban => |
09-04-2014 10:32 | Tomas Urban | File Added: CR6714_v1.docx | |
09-04-2014 10:35 | Tomas Urban | Note Added: 0011967 | |
09-04-2014 10:35 | Tomas Urban | Assigned To | => Jens Grabowski |
09-04-2014 13:31 | Tomas Urban | Relationship added | related to 0006717 |
09-04-2014 14:03 | Gyorgy Rethy | Priority | normal => urgent |
10-04-2014 11:07 | Tomas Urban | Status | assigned => confirmed |
10-04-2014 11:47 | Jens Grabowski | Note Added: 0011994 | |
10-04-2014 11:47 | Jens Grabowski | Assigned To | Jens Grabowski => Tomas Urban |
10-04-2014 11:47 | Jens Grabowski | Status | confirmed => assigned |
10-04-2014 11:48 | Jens Grabowski | Status | assigned => confirmed |
10-04-2014 13:10 | Tomas Urban | File Added: CR6714_v2.docx | |
10-04-2014 13:12 | Tomas Urban | Note Added: 0012001 | |
10-04-2014 13:12 | Tomas Urban | Assigned To | Tomas Urban => Jens Grabowski |
07-05-2014 16:30 | Gyorgy Rethy | Project | TTCN-3 Change Requests => Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language |
11-05-2014 20:49 | Gyorgy Rethy | Target Version | => v4.7.1 (published 2015-06) |
16-06-2014 09:02 | Jens Grabowski | Note Added: 0012073 | |
16-06-2014 09:03 | Jens Grabowski | Assigned To | Jens Grabowski => Gyorgy Rethy |
16-06-2014 09:03 | Jens Grabowski | Status | confirmed => assigned |
16-06-2014 09:04 | Jens Grabowski | Status | assigned => resolved |
16-06-2014 09:04 | Jens Grabowski | Resolution | open => fixed |
17-06-2014 15:58 | Gyorgy Rethy | Product Version | => v4.5.1 (published 2013-04) |
17-06-2014 15:58 | Gyorgy Rethy | Fixed in Version | => v4.6.2 (interim 2014) |
17-06-2014 15:58 | Gyorgy Rethy | Target Version | v4.7.1 (published 2015-06) => v4.6.2 (interim 2014) |
20-06-2014 11:54 | Gyorgy Rethy | Fixed in Version | v4.6.2 (interim 2014) => |
01-08-2014 14:40 | Gyorgy Rethy | Note Added: 0012210 | |
01-08-2014 14:40 | Gyorgy Rethy | Status | resolved => confirmed |
01-08-2014 14:41 | Gyorgy Rethy | File Added: CR6714_v3.docx | |
01-08-2014 14:41 | Gyorgy Rethy | Assigned To | Gyorgy Rethy => Tomas Urban |
01-08-2014 14:41 | Gyorgy Rethy | Status | confirmed => assigned |
01-08-2014 14:42 | Gyorgy Rethy | Status | assigned => confirmed |
11-08-2014 10:15 | Tomas Urban | File Added: CR6714_v4.docx | |
11-08-2014 10:19 | Tomas Urban | Note Added: 0012214 | |
11-08-2014 10:19 | Tomas Urban | Assigned To | Tomas Urban => Gyorgy Rethy |
23-09-2014 15:25 | Gyorgy Rethy | Status | confirmed => closed |
23-09-2014 15:25 | Gyorgy Rethy | Fixed in Version | => v4.6.2 (interim 2014) |
MantisBT 1.2.14 [^] Copyright © 2000 - 2024 MantisBT Team |