Logo etsi

ETSI's Bug Tracker
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Monitor project
  
Notice: information submitted on the ETSI issue Tracker may be incorporated in ETSI publication(s) and therefore subject to the ETSI IPR policy.

View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ]
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0006315ASN.1Base Specpublic20-09-2012 16:4108-10-2012 17:12
ReporterSebastian Muellers 
Assigned ToAndras Kovacs 
PrioritynormalSeverityminorReproducibilityhave not tried
StatusclosedResolutionfixed 
PlatformOSOS Version
Product Versionv0.0.3 
Target VersionFixed in VersionV0.0.4 
Summary0006315: delet SHALL in asn.1 comments
DescriptionThe comments in the last two definitions: type specific RSU containers shall be added as extensions. I think the word SHALL can be removed, we do not want to impose anything of RSU in this standard, right? So no need to write a requirement here. We can use: type specific RSU containers might be added as extensions.
 
 -- further type specific containers may be added as extensions
TagsNo tags attached.
Attached Files

- Relationships

-  Notes
(0011147)
Andras Kovacs (developer)
26-09-2012 17:12

 Update done.
I agree that the '-- further type specific RSU containers might be added as extensions' comment phrasing is better. I kept the RSU word, to indicate that this expectation is the reason for the extensibility here

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
20-09-2012 16:41 Sebastian Muellers New Issue
26-09-2012 17:12 Andras Kovacs Note Added: 0011147
26-09-2012 17:12 Andras Kovacs Assigned To => Andras Kovacs
26-09-2012 17:12 Andras Kovacs Status new => confirmed
08-10-2012 17:12 Sebastian Muellers Status confirmed => closed
08-10-2012 17:12 Sebastian Muellers Resolution open => fixed
08-10-2012 17:12 Sebastian Muellers Fixed in Version => V0.0.4

MantisBT 1.2.14 [^]
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 MantisBT Team
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker