Logo etsi

ETSI's Bug Tracker
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Monitor project
  
Notice: information submitted on the ETSI issue Tracker may be incorporated in ETSI publication(s) and therefore subject to the ETSI IPR policy.

View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ]
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0004402Part 01: TTCN-3 Core LanguageTechnicalpublic31-10-2008 12:5410-12-2008 12:39
ReporterGyorgy Rethy 
Assigned ToIna Schieferdecker 
PrioritynormalSeverityminorReproducibilityalways
StatusclosedResolutionfixed 
PlatformOSOS Version
Product Versionv3.3.2 (published 2008-04) 
Target Versionv4.1.1 (published 2009-06)Fixed in Versionv4.1.1 (published 2009-06) 
Summary0004402: Unneeded restriction in referencing record/set fields
DescriptionThe current text says:
"Elements of a record shall be referenced by the dot notation TypeOrValueId.ElementId, where TypeOrValueId resolves to the name of a structured type or variable."
It is unneeded to restrict the reference to variables only, it should be allowed for values (all kind) and templates.
TagsNo tags attached.
Clause Reference(s)6.2.1.1
Source (company - Author)     
Attached Filesdoc file icon CR4402_DotNotation.doc [^] (28,672 bytes) 25-11-2008 08:26

- Relationships
related to 0004269closedIna Schieferdecker Allow dotted and index notation for result of function calls 

-  Notes
(0007237)
tepelmann (reporter)
31-10-2008 14:03

 Maybe this issue can be merged with issue#0004269, or is it a duplicate?
(0007241)
Gyorgy Rethy (reporter)
31-10-2008 14:28

 No, this issue differs from CR4269. While this one is a simple wrong wording that needs to be corrected (pls. note, the BNF allows using field/index references in constant expressions, template variables etc.), CR4269 requests for a new feature that needs to be discussed. Thus this CR can be resolved independent of CR4269.
(0007395)
Ina Schieferdecker (reporter)
25-11-2008 08:29

 Indeed, already now more is allowed for the dot notation than just variables - still, it is quite artificial not to allow function invocations as well. I uploaded a proposal which addresses both CRs - please check.
(0007402)
Thomas Deiß (reporter)
25-11-2008 11:08

 The resolution is ok.

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
31-10-2008 12:54 Gyorgy Rethy New Issue
31-10-2008 12:54 Gyorgy Rethy Status new => assigned
31-10-2008 12:54 Gyorgy Rethy Assigned To => Ina Schieferdecker
31-10-2008 12:54 Gyorgy Rethy Clause Reference(s) => 6.2.1.1
31-10-2008 12:54 Gyorgy Rethy Source (company - Author) =>
31-10-2008 14:03 tepelmann Note Added: 0007237
31-10-2008 14:28 Gyorgy Rethy Note Added: 0007241
24-11-2008 17:57 Ina Schieferdecker Relationship added related to 0004269
25-11-2008 08:26 Ina Schieferdecker File Added: CR4402_DotNotation.doc
25-11-2008 08:29 Ina Schieferdecker Note Added: 0007395
25-11-2008 08:30 Ina Schieferdecker Assigned To Ina Schieferdecker => Thomas Deiß
25-11-2008 08:30 Ina Schieferdecker Target Version => Edition 4.1.1 (not yet published)
25-11-2008 11:08 Thomas Deiß Note Added: 0007402
25-11-2008 11:08 Thomas Deiß Assigned To Thomas Deiß => Ina Schieferdecker
10-12-2008 12:39 Ina Schieferdecker Status assigned => resolved
10-12-2008 12:39 Ina Schieferdecker Resolution open => fixed
10-12-2008 12:39 Ina Schieferdecker Fixed in Version => Edition 4.1.1 (not yet published)
10-12-2008 12:39 Ina Schieferdecker Status resolved => closed

MantisBT 1.2.14 [^]
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 MantisBT Team
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker