Logo etsi

ETSI's Bug Tracker

Notice: information submitted on the ETSI issue Tracker may be incorporated in ETSI publication(s) and therefore subject to the ETSI IPR policy.

View Issue Details Jump to Notes ] Issue History ] Print ]
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0008129SOL001 - TOSCA-based NFV descriptors spec[NFV Specifications] Feature Gappublic16-09-2022 07:5721-05-2024 15:32
ReporterSujeet Banerjee 
Assigned To 
Prioritynormal 
StatusnewResolutionopen 
Product Version4.2.1 
Target VersionFixed in Version 
Summary0008129: [V4.3.1] [Table 6.10.10.2-1] "NOTE2" Discrepancy: does not support all use cases for HelmCharts
DescriptionCurrent state of the note2 in the document:

-----
NOTE 2: The "container"namespace" is only applicable when the targets of the policy are exclusively nodes of type
tosca.nodes.nfv.Mciop.
-----

This is a problem because, some Helm-Charts may have the intent to create OS-containers that would be deployed in more than one Kubernetes namespace. So, "container_namespace" must be allowed at VDU level as well.
TagsNo tags attached.
Attached Files

- Relationships

-  Notes
(0016655)
lishi (developer)
15-05-2024 14:23

My understanding is that the namespace related to VDU is defined inside MCIOP (e.g. Helm chart), it is not applicable for MANO to manage something inside MCIOP.
(0016660)
Sujeet Banerjee (reporter)
21-05-2024 15:32

@lishi, Did you mean MANO would have no control over the namespaces that would be deployed by the Helm-charts?

If that were true, then how would the orchestrator control VDUs that have affinity or/and anti-affinity rules over namespaces defined in the VNFD??

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
16-09-2022 07:57 Sujeet Banerjee New Issue
15-12-2022 09:18 Sujeet Banerjee Issue cloned: 0008178
15-05-2024 14:23 lishi Note Added: 0016655
21-05-2024 15:32 Sujeet Banerjee Note Added: 0016660


MantisBT 1.2.14 [^]
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 MantisBT Team
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker