Commit a7451f68 authored by Yann Garcia's avatar Yann Garcia
Browse files

Review the conclusion (clause A.3.7 Conclusions

parent db88dcdb
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+3 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -624,7 +624,9 @@ The use of Simu5G/SimuLTE simulators [\[i.5\]] provides the following advantages

***
The counterpart is a huge changes in the current ETSI MEC Sandbox architecture, and a higher complexity. To support 10 simultaneous connections to the new ETSI MEC Sandbox, a very higher hardware requirements are necessary (CPUs, GPUs & memories).
In addition, a warning shall be raised regarding performance. A network scenarion containing a lot of PoAs and UEs can drastically reduces the performance of the Simu5G/4G simulators. The objective of 10 simulatanneous conections on the MEC Sandbox could be achieved.
In addition, two warnings shall be raised regarding performance and the objectives to achieve:
1. A network scenarion containing a lot of PoAs and UEs can drastically reduces the performance of the Simu5G/4G simulators. The objective of 10 simulatanneous conections on the MEC Sandbox could be achieved.
2. Regarding the huge amount of work to be done to replace the current network simulation with Simu5G/SimuLTE simulators [\[i.5\]], the objective of the Task#3 as defined in the STF 707 ToR, could be partially covered. An extension of this STF may be required (or a split with a future STF ?) 
***

**Note:** In addition, a phase of learning is mandatory before to start the replacement of the current network similation by Simu5G/Simu4G simulators [\[i.5\]].