... | @@ -11,9 +11,13 @@ The "Clauses affected" field should reference each attachment that is being chan |
... | @@ -11,9 +11,13 @@ The "Clauses affected" field should reference each attachment that is being chan |
|
|
|
|
|
> **EXAMPLE**
|
|
> **EXAMPLE**
|
|
>
|
|
>
|
|
> A CR proposes adding a new field to TS 102 232-1. This involves adding a new clause to section 6, and making a change to the ASN.1 module in attachment **LI-PS-PDU.asn**.
|
|
> A CR proposes making a change to TS 103 120 which involves:
|
|
>
|
|
>
|
|
> The "Clauses affected" field should therefore read "New clause 6.X, LI-PS-PDU.asn"
|
|
> * adding some new text to clause 8.2,
|
|
|
|
> * changing **ts_103120_Task.xsd**
|
|
|
|
> * changing **ts_103120_ETSIDictionaryDefinitions.xml**.
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
> The "Clauses affected" field should therefore read "**Clause 8.2, ts_103120_Task.xsd, ts_103120_ETSIDictionaryDefinitions.xml**"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes to attachments should be given in the CR, as a single change block containing a plain diff of the changes to the attachments.
|
|
Changes to attachments should be given in the CR, as a single change block containing a plain diff of the changes to the attachments.
|
|
|
|
|
... | | ... | |