New TPs added (0d3a77d4) · Commits · INT - Core Network and Interoperability Testing / Voice and Video over LTE / Emergency VoLTE Interoperability Tests

test_purposes/Gm/TP_GM.tplan2

+90 −0

Original line number	Diff line number	Diff line
		@@ -496,5 +496,95 @@ Package TP_GM {

		} // End of TP_GM_PCSCF_ECO_CANCEL_01

		Test Purpose {

		TP Id TP_GM_PCSCF_ECO_200OK_BYE_01

		Test objective "Verify that the P-CSCF successfully processes a 200 (OK) BYE (Originating Leg)."

		Reference
		"ETSI TS 124 229 [1], Clauses 5.1.5 and 6.1"

		Config Id CF_VoLTE_INT_ES

		PICS Selection NONE

		Initial conditions with {
		the UE_A entity isEmergencyAttachedTo the EPC_A and
		the UE_A entity isEmergencyRegisteredTo the IMS_A
		}

		Expected behaviour
		ensure that {
		when {
		the IMS_P_CSCF_A entity sends a 200_Ok containing
		From indicating value PX_UE_B_SIP_URI,
		To indicating value PX_UE_A_SIP_URI,
		CallId indicating value PX_UE_B_CALLID,
		Via indicating value PX_UE_B_VIA,
		Route indicating value PX_UE_B_SERVICE_ROUTE;
		from the IMS_E_CSCF entity
		}
		then {
		the IMS_P_CSCF_A entity sends a 200_Ok containing
		From indicating value PX_UE_B_SIP_URI,
		To indicating value PX_UE_A_SIP_URI,
		CallId indicating value PX_UE_B_CALLID,
		Via indicating value PX_UE_B_VIA,
		Route indicating value PX_UE_B_SERVICE_ROUTE,
		not PChargingVector,
		not PChargingFunctionAddresses,
		not PPreferredIdentity;
		to the UE_A entity
		}
		}

		} // End of TP_GM_PCSCF_ECO_200OK_01

		Test Purpose {

		TP Id TP_GM_PCSCF_ECO_200OK_BYE_02

		Test objective "Verify that the P-CSCF successfully processes a 200 (OK) BYE (Terminating Leg)."

		Reference
		"ETSI TS 124 229 [1], Clauses 5.1.5 and 6.1"

		Config Id CF_VoLTE_INT_ES

		PICS Selection NONE

		Initial conditions with {
		the UE_A entity isEmergencyAttachedTo the EPC_A and
		the UE_A entity isEmergencyRegisteredTo the IMS_A
		}

		Expected behaviour
		ensure that {
		when {
		the IMS_P_CSCF_A entity receives a 200_Ok containing
		From indicating value PX_UE_A_SIP_URI,
		To indicating value PX_UE_B_SIP_URI,
		CallId indicating value PX_UE_A_CALLID,
		Via indicating value PX_UE_A_VIA,
		Route indicating value PX_UE_A_SERVICE_ROUTE,
		not PChargingVector,
		not PChargingFunctionAddresses,
		not PPreferredIdentity;
		from the UE_A entity
		}
		then {
		the IMS_P_CSCF_A entity sends a 200_Ok containing
		From indicating value PX_UE_A_SIP_URI,
		To indicating value PX_UE_B_SIP_URI,
		CallId indicating value PX_UE_A_CALLID,
		Via indicating value PX_UE_A_VIA,
		Route indicating value PX_UE_A_SERVICE_ROUTE;
		to the IMS_E_CSCF entity
		}
		}

		} // End of TP_GM_PCSCF_ECO_200OK_02

		} // End of Package TP_GM

test_purposes/Mw/TP_MW_PS.tplan2

+100 −0

Original line number	Diff line number	Diff line
		@@ -447,6 +447,106 @@ Package TP_MW_PS {

		} // End of TP_MW_PCSCF_ECO_480INVITE_01

		Test Purpose {

		TP Id TP_MW_PCSCF_ECO_380INVITE_01

		Test objective "Verify that the P-CSCF rejects an initial INVITE from an emergency registered UE
		if the IMS is not capable or does not handle emergency sessions."

		Reference
		"ETSI TS 124 229 [1], Clause 5.2.10.5"

		Config Id CF_VoLTE_INT_ES

		PICS Selection NONE

		Initial conditions with {
		the UE_A entity isAttachedTo the EPC_A and
		the UE_A entity isRegisteredTo the IMS_A
		}

		Expected behaviour
		ensure that {
		when {
		the IMS_P_CSCF_A entity receives a INVITE containing
		From indicating value PX_UE_A_SIP_URI,
		To indicating value PX_SIP_EMERGENCY_SERVICE_URN,
		CallId indicating value PX_UE_A_CALLID,
		Via indicating value PX_E_CSCF_VIA,
		Route indicating value PX_E_CSCF_SERVICE_ROUTE;
		from the UE_A entity
		}
		then {
		the IMS_P_CSCF_A entity sends a 380_AlternativeService containing
		From indicating value PX_UE_A_SIP_URI,
		To indicating value PX_SIP_EMERGENCY_SERVICE_URN,
		CallId indicating value PX_UE_A_CALLID,
		Via indicating value PX_P_CSCF_A_VIA,
		PAssertedIdentity,
		MessageBody containing
		XML containing
		Version indicating value "1",
		Type_child indicating value "emergency",
		Reason_child,
		Action_child;;;
		to the UE_A entity
		}
		}

		} // End of TP_MW_PCSCF_ECO_380INVITE_01

		Test Purpose {

		TP Id TP_MW_PCSCF_ECO_380INVITE_02

		Test objective "Verify that the P-CSCF rejects an initial INVITE from an emergency registered UE
		if received Request-URI is wrong - not in accordance with RFC 5031."

		Reference
		"ETSI TS 124 229 [1], Clauses 5.2.10.4 and 5.2.10.5
		RFC 5031"

		Config Id CF_VoLTE_INT_ES

		PICS Selection NONE

		Initial conditions with {
		the UE_A entity isAttachedTo the EPC_A and
		the UE_A entity isRegisteredTo the IMS_A
		}

		Expected behaviour
		ensure that {
		when {
		the IMS_P_CSCF_A entity receives a INVITE containing
		From indicating value PX_UE_A_SIP_URI,
		To indicating value PX_SIP_WRONG_EMERGENCY_SERVICE_URN,
		CallId indicating value PX_UE_A_CALLID,
		Via indicating value PX_E_CSCF_VIA,
		Route indicating value PX_E_CSCF_SERVICE_ROUTE;
		from the UE_A entity
		}
		then {
		the IMS_P_CSCF_A entity sends a 380_AlternativeService containing
		From indicating value PX_UE_A_SIP_URI,
		To indicating value PX_SIP_EMERGENCY_SERVICE_URN,
		CallId indicating value PX_UE_A_CALLID,
		Content_type,
		Via indicating value PX_P_CSCF_A_VIA,
		PAssertedIdentity,
		MessageBody containing
		XML containing
		Version indicating value "1",
		Type_child indicating value "emergency",
		Reason_child,
		Action_child;;;
		to the UE_A entity
		}
		}

		} // End of TP_MW_PCSCF_ECO_380INVITE_02

		Test Purpose {

		TP Id TP_MW_PCSCF_ECO_BYE_01