New TPs added (0d3a77d4) · Commits · INT - Core Network and Interoperability Testing / Voice and Video over LTE / Emergency VoLTE Interoperability Tests

test_purposes/Gm/TP_GM.tplan2

+90 −0

Original line number	Original line	Diff line number	Diff line
	@@ -496,5 +496,95 @@ Package TP_GM {

	} // End of TP_GM_PCSCF_ECO_CANCEL_01		} // End of TP_GM_PCSCF_ECO_CANCEL_01

			Test Purpose {

			TP Id TP_GM_PCSCF_ECO_200OK_BYE_01

			Test objective "Verify that the P-CSCF successfully processes a 200 (OK) BYE (Originating Leg)."

			Reference
			"ETSI TS 124 229 [1], Clauses 5.1.5 and 6.1"

			Config Id CF_VoLTE_INT_ES

			PICS Selection NONE

			Initial conditions with {
			the UE_A entity isEmergencyAttachedTo the EPC_A and
			the UE_A entity isEmergencyRegisteredTo the IMS_A
			}

			Expected behaviour
			ensure that {
			when {
			the IMS_P_CSCF_A entity sends a 200_Ok containing
			From indicating value PX_UE_B_SIP_URI,
			To indicating value PX_UE_A_SIP_URI,
			CallId indicating value PX_UE_B_CALLID,
			Via indicating value PX_UE_B_VIA,
			Route indicating value PX_UE_B_SERVICE_ROUTE;
			from the IMS_E_CSCF entity
			}
			then {
			the IMS_P_CSCF_A entity sends a 200_Ok containing
			From indicating value PX_UE_B_SIP_URI,
			To indicating value PX_UE_A_SIP_URI,
			CallId indicating value PX_UE_B_CALLID,
			Via indicating value PX_UE_B_VIA,
			Route indicating value PX_UE_B_SERVICE_ROUTE,
			not PChargingVector,
			not PChargingFunctionAddresses,
			not PPreferredIdentity;
			to the UE_A entity
			}
			}

			} // End of TP_GM_PCSCF_ECO_200OK_01

			Test Purpose {

			TP Id TP_GM_PCSCF_ECO_200OK_BYE_02

			Test objective "Verify that the P-CSCF successfully processes a 200 (OK) BYE (Terminating Leg)."

			Reference
			"ETSI TS 124 229 [1], Clauses 5.1.5 and 6.1"

			Config Id CF_VoLTE_INT_ES

			PICS Selection NONE

			Initial conditions with {
			the UE_A entity isEmergencyAttachedTo the EPC_A and
			the UE_A entity isEmergencyRegisteredTo the IMS_A
			}

			Expected behaviour
			ensure that {
			when {
			the IMS_P_CSCF_A entity receives a 200_Ok containing
			From indicating value PX_UE_A_SIP_URI,
			To indicating value PX_UE_B_SIP_URI,
			CallId indicating value PX_UE_A_CALLID,
			Via indicating value PX_UE_A_VIA,
			Route indicating value PX_UE_A_SERVICE_ROUTE,
			not PChargingVector,
			not PChargingFunctionAddresses,
			not PPreferredIdentity;
			from the UE_A entity
			}
			then {
			the IMS_P_CSCF_A entity sends a 200_Ok containing
			From indicating value PX_UE_A_SIP_URI,
			To indicating value PX_UE_B_SIP_URI,
			CallId indicating value PX_UE_A_CALLID,
			Via indicating value PX_UE_A_VIA,
			Route indicating value PX_UE_A_SERVICE_ROUTE;
			to the IMS_E_CSCF entity
			}
			}

			} // End of TP_GM_PCSCF_ECO_200OK_02

	} // End of Package TP_GM		} // End of Package TP_GM

test_purposes/Mw/TP_MW_PS.tplan2

+100 −0

Original line number	Original line	Diff line number	Diff line
	@@ -447,6 +447,106 @@ Package TP_MW_PS {

	} // End of TP_MW_PCSCF_ECO_480INVITE_01		} // End of TP_MW_PCSCF_ECO_480INVITE_01

			Test Purpose {

			TP Id TP_MW_PCSCF_ECO_380INVITE_01

			Test objective "Verify that the P-CSCF rejects an initial INVITE from an emergency registered UE
			if the IMS is not capable or does not handle emergency sessions."

			Reference
			"ETSI TS 124 229 [1], Clause 5.2.10.5"

			Config Id CF_VoLTE_INT_ES

			PICS Selection NONE

			Initial conditions with {
			the UE_A entity isAttachedTo the EPC_A and
			the UE_A entity isRegisteredTo the IMS_A
			}

			Expected behaviour
			ensure that {
			when {
			the IMS_P_CSCF_A entity receives a INVITE containing
			From indicating value PX_UE_A_SIP_URI,
			To indicating value PX_SIP_EMERGENCY_SERVICE_URN,
			CallId indicating value PX_UE_A_CALLID,
			Via indicating value PX_E_CSCF_VIA,
			Route indicating value PX_E_CSCF_SERVICE_ROUTE;
			from the UE_A entity
			}
			then {
			the IMS_P_CSCF_A entity sends a 380_AlternativeService containing
			From indicating value PX_UE_A_SIP_URI,
			To indicating value PX_SIP_EMERGENCY_SERVICE_URN,
			CallId indicating value PX_UE_A_CALLID,
			Via indicating value PX_P_CSCF_A_VIA,
			PAssertedIdentity,
			MessageBody containing
			XML containing
			Version indicating value "1",
			Type_child indicating value "emergency",
			Reason_child,
			Action_child;;;
			to the UE_A entity
			}
			}

			} // End of TP_MW_PCSCF_ECO_380INVITE_01

			Test Purpose {

			TP Id TP_MW_PCSCF_ECO_380INVITE_02

			Test objective "Verify that the P-CSCF rejects an initial INVITE from an emergency registered UE
			if received Request-URI is wrong - not in accordance with RFC 5031."

			Reference
			"ETSI TS 124 229 [1], Clauses 5.2.10.4 and 5.2.10.5
			RFC 5031"

			Config Id CF_VoLTE_INT_ES

			PICS Selection NONE

			Initial conditions with {
			the UE_A entity isAttachedTo the EPC_A and
			the UE_A entity isRegisteredTo the IMS_A
			}

			Expected behaviour
			ensure that {
			when {
			the IMS_P_CSCF_A entity receives a INVITE containing
			From indicating value PX_UE_A_SIP_URI,
			To indicating value PX_SIP_WRONG_EMERGENCY_SERVICE_URN,
			CallId indicating value PX_UE_A_CALLID,
			Via indicating value PX_E_CSCF_VIA,
			Route indicating value PX_E_CSCF_SERVICE_ROUTE;
			from the UE_A entity
			}
			then {
			the IMS_P_CSCF_A entity sends a 380_AlternativeService containing
			From indicating value PX_UE_A_SIP_URI,
			To indicating value PX_SIP_EMERGENCY_SERVICE_URN,
			CallId indicating value PX_UE_A_CALLID,
			Content_type,
			Via indicating value PX_P_CSCF_A_VIA,
			PAssertedIdentity,
			MessageBody containing
			XML containing
			Version indicating value "1",
			Type_child indicating value "emergency",
			Reason_child,
			Action_child;;;
			to the UE_A entity
			}
			}

			} // End of TP_MW_PCSCF_ECO_380INVITE_02

	Test Purpose {		Test Purpose {

	TP Id TP_MW_PCSCF_ECO_BYE_01		TP Id TP_MW_PCSCF_ECO_BYE_01

Admin message