I've fixed the @desc statements and have added new comments. (3f46e75d) · Commits · INT - Core Network and Interoperability Testing / IMS / IMS_NIT

AtsNIT_SipSip/ttcn/AtsNIT_SipSip_PICS.ttcn

+94 −48

Original line number	Diff line number	Diff line
		/*
		* @author STF 366
		/**
		* @author STF 369
		* @version $Id$
		* @desc This module contains the module parameters given in
		* "SIP-ISUP Interworking between the IP Multimedia (IM) Core Network (CN) subsystem and Circuit Switched (CS) networks; PICS"
		@@ -11,241 +11,287 @@ group PICS_Module_Parameters
		{
		modulepar {
		// Roles Table 1
		/* @desc Does the SUT implement Profile A?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT implement Profile A?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 1, Item 1
		*/
		boolean PC_IMPL_PROF_A;

		/* @desc Does the SUT implement Profile B?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT implement Profile B?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 1, Item 2
		*/
		boolean PC_IMPL_PROF_B;

		/* @desc Is the SUT connected to a BICC Network?
		/**
		* @desc Is the SUT connected to a BICC Network?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 1, Item 4
		*/
		boolean PC_CONN_BICC;

		/* @desc Is the SUT connected to an ISUP Network?
		/**
		* @desc Is the SUT connected to an ISUP Network?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 1, Item 5
		*/
		boolean PC_CONN_ISUP;

		/* @desc Is the SUT connected with a �-law network?
		/**
		* @desc Is the SUT connected with a �-law network?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 1, Item 6
		*/
		boolean PC_CONN_MULAW;

		/* @desc Is the SUT connected with an outgoing international exchange?
		/**
		* @desc Is the SUT connected with an outgoing international exchange?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 1, Item 7
		*/
		boolean PC_CONN_OUT_INTERNAT;

		/* @desc Is the SUT connected with an incoming international exchange?
		/**
		* @desc Is the SUT connected with an incoming international exchange?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 1, Item 8
		*/
		boolean PC_CONN_INC_INTERNAT;

		/* @desc Is the SUT an implementation according ETSI EN 383 001?
		/**
		* @desc Is the SUT an implementation according ETSI EN 383 001?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 1, Item 9
		*/
		boolean PC_IMPL_383_001;

		// ForwardAddressSignalling Table 3
		/* @desc Does the SIP implementation use the en bloc operation in the forward address signalling (sending)?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SIP implementation use the en bloc operation in the forward address signalling (sending)?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 3, Item 1
		*/
		boolean PC_USE_SIP_TX_ENBLOCK;

		/* @desc Does the SIP implementation use the overlap operation in the forward address signalling (sending)?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SIP implementation use the overlap operation in the forward address signalling (sending)?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 3, Item 2
		*/
		boolean PC_USE_SIP_TX_OVERLAP;

		/* @desc Does the SIP implementation support the overlap operation in the forward address signalling (receiving)?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SIP implementation support the overlap operation in the forward address signalling (receiving)?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 3, Item 4
		*/
		boolean PC_SUPP_SIP_RX_OVERLAP;

		/* @desc Does the ISUP implementation support the overlap operation in the forward address signalling (receiving)?
		/**
		* @desc Does the ISUP implementation support the overlap operation in the forward address signalling (receiving)?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 3, Item 8
		*/
		boolean PC_SUPP_ISUP_RX_OVERLAP;


		// RoleIndependentCapabilities Table 4
		/* @desc Does the SUT use the Continuity check procedures during call setup?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT use the Continuity check procedures during call setup?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 4, Item 1
		*/
		boolean PC_USE_CONT_CHK;

		/* @desc Does the SUT support the Continuity check procedures during call setup?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT support the Continuity check procedures during call setup?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 4, Item 2
		*/
		boolean PC_SUPP_CONT_CHK;

		/* @desc Does the SUT support internal resource reservations (preconditons used)?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT support internal resource reservations (preconditons used)?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 4, Item 4
		*/
		boolean PC_SUPP_INT_RESOURCE;

		/* @desc Is the SUT able to support the reliability of provisional responses?
		/**
		* @desc Is the SUT able to support the reliability of provisional responses?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 4, Item 5
		*/
		boolean PC_SUPP_RELY_PROV;

		/* @desc Does the SUT perform the automatic repeat attempt?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT perform the automatic repeat attempt?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 4, Item 6
		*/
		boolean PC_PERF_AUT_REPEAT;

		/* @desc Does the SUT send an ACM message after determination of end of address signalling?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT send an ACM message after determination of end of address signalling?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 4, Item 9
		*/
		boolean PC_SEND_ACM_EOA;

		/* @desc Does the SUT map the REL cause value into the reason header field of a SIP message (BYE, CANCEL or SIP final response)?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT map the REL cause value into the reason header field of a SIP message (BYE, CANCEL or SIP final response)?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 4, Item 10
		*/
		boolean PC_MAP_REL_CAUSE;

		/* @desc Does the SUT map a received reason header field included in a SIP message (BYE, CANCEL or SIP final response) to the ISUP cause value in the sent REL?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT map a received reason header field included in a SIP message (BYE, CANCEL or SIP final response) to the ISUP cause value in the sent REL?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 4, Item 11
		*/
		boolean PC_MAP_REASON_REL;

		/* @desc Does the SUT interwork the SIP Failure response to ISUP?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT interwork the SIP Failure response to ISUP?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 4, Item 12
		*/
		boolean PC_INTERW_SIP_FAIL;

		/* @desc Does the SUT derive the Display-name in the "From header field" from the "additional calling party number" or "calling party number"?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT derive the Display-name in the "From header field" from the "additional calling party number" or "calling party number"?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 4, Item 13
		*/
		boolean PC_DERIV_DISPL_FROM;

		/* @desc Does the SUT control the exchange for the Suspend procedure?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT control the exchange for the Suspend procedure?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 4, Item 14
		*/
		boolean PC_CTRL_SUSP;

		/* @desc Does the SUT use internal resource reservations (preconditons used)?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT use internal resource reservations (preconditons used)?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 4, Item 15
		*/
		boolean PC_USE_INT_RESOURCE;

		/* @desc Does the SUT satisfy the call using a new address provided in a Contact header field received in a 3xx response?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT satisfy the call using a new address provided in a Contact header field received in a 3xx response?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 4, Item 17
		*/
		boolean PC_USE_NEW_ADDR_CONTACT;

		/* @desc Does the SUT refuse an offer with a 415 Unsupported media type response if more than one media typs are received in a SDP?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT refuse an offer with a 415 Unsupported media type response if more than one media typs are received in a SDP?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 4, Item 19
		*/
		boolean PC_REFUSE_415_OFFER;

		/* @desc Does the SUT derive the Display-name in the "P-Asserted-Identity header field" from the "calling party number" or "additional calling party number"?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT derive the Display-name in the "P-Asserted-Identity header field" from the "calling party number" or "additional calling party number"?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 4, Item 20
		*/
		boolean PC_DERIV_DISP_P_ASS;

		/* @desc Does the SUT redirect to a new destination according the BICC/ISUP requirements if a REL is received with cause 23?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT redirect to a new destination according the BICC/ISUP requirements if a REL is received with cause 23?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 4, Item 21
		*/
		boolean PC_REDIR_CAUSE_23;

		/* @desc What is the value of PICS item 23 in table 4?
		/**
		* @desc What is the value of PICS item 23 in table 4?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 4, Item 23
		*/
		boolean PC_TABLE4_23;

		/* @desc What is the value of PICS item 23 in table 4?
		/**
		* @desc What is the value of PICS item 23 in table 4?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 4, Item 24
		*/
		boolean PC_TABLE4_24;

		// SupplementaryServiceMajorCapabilities Table 5
		/* @desc Does the SUT support the service Call Hold (HOLD)?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT support the service Call Hold (HOLD)?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 5, Item 5
		*/
		boolean PC_SUPP_HOLD;

		/* @desc Does the SUT support the service Terminal Portability (TP)?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT support the service Terminal Portability (TP)?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 5, Item 6
		*/
		boolean PC_SUPP_TP;

		/* @desc Does the SUT support the service Conference Call, add-on (CONF)?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT support the service Conference Call, add-on (CONF)?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 5, Item 10
		*/
		boolean PC_SUPP_CONF;

		/* @desc Does the SUT support the Three-Party (3PTY) service?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT support the Three-Party (3PTY) service?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 5, Item 18
		*/
		boolean PC_SUPP_3PTY;

		// CLI Table 6
		/* @desc Does the SUT include a network provided E.164 calling party number if the P-Asserted -Identity header field has not been received or not in the format "+"CC+NDC+SN; address signal: network provided?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT include a network provided E.164 calling party number if the P-Asserted -Identity header field has not been received or not in the format "+"CC+NDC+SN; address signal: network provided?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 6, Item 1
		*/
		boolean PC_INCL_E164_P_ASS_NTWK;

		/* @desc Does the SUT include an addtional calling party number if a From header field has been received in the format "+"CC+NDC+SN; address signal: derived from the From header field?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT include an addtional calling party number if a From header field has been received in the format "+"CC+NDC+SN; address signal: derived from the From header field?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 6, Item 3
		*/
		boolean PC_INCL_ADD_CLD_FROM;

		/* @desc Does the SUT send a Calling Party Number with an Number Presentation restriction Indicator set to "presentation allowed" if no P-Asserted -Identity header field has not been received or not in the format "+"CC+NDC+SN?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT send a Calling Party Number with an Number Presentation restriction Indicator set to "presentation allowed" if no P-Asserted -Identity header field has not been received or not in the format "+"CC+NDC+SN?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 6, Item 9
		*/
		boolean PC_SEND_CLI_ALLOWED_NO_P;

		/* @desc Does the SUT send a Calling Party Number with an Number Presentation restriction Indicator set to "address not available" if no P-Asserted -Identity header field has not been received or not in the format "+"CC+NDC+SN?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT send a Calling Party Number with an Number Presentation restriction Indicator set to "address not available" if no P-Asserted -Identity header field has not been received or not in the format "+"CC+NDC+SN?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 6, Item 11
		*/
		boolean PC_SEND_CLI_NOT_AVAIL_NO_P;

		/* @desc Does the SUT send a Calling Party Number with an Number Presentation restriction Indicator set to "resentation restricted by the network" if no P-Asserted -Identity header field has not been received or not in the format "+"CC+NDC+SN?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT send a Calling Party Number with an Number Presentation restriction Indicator set to "resentation restricted by the network" if no P-Asserted -Identity header field has not been received or not in the format "+"CC+NDC+SN?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 6, Item 12
		*/
		boolean PC_SEND_CLI_RESTR_NTWK_NO_P;

		// HOLD Table 8
		/* @desc Does the SUT support that a party can put the other party on hold after alerting has commenced?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT support that a party can put the other party on hold after alerting has commenced?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 8, Item 1
		*/
		boolean PC_SUPP_HOLD_AFTER_ALERT;

		/* @desc Does the SUT support that a party can put the other party on hold after the calling user has provided all of the information necessary for processing the call?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT support that a party can put the other party on hold after the calling user has provided all of the information necessary for processing the call?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 8, Item 2
		*/
		boolean PC_SUPP_HOLD_NEC_INFO;

		// MCID Table 9
		/* @desc Does the SUT return an IRS with bit A of the MCID response indicator set to 0 "MCID not included", if the network does not support the MCID service?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT return an IRS with bit A of the MCID response indicator set to 0 "MCID not included", if the network does not support the MCID service?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 9, Item 1
		*/
		boolean PC_RET_IRS_MCID_NOT;

		// UUS Table 11
		/* @desc Does the SUT understand an explicit user-to-user request?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT understand an explicit user-to-user request?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 11, Item 1
		*/
		boolean PC_IMPL_EXPL_USER_USER;

		/* @desc Does the SUT support the rejection procedure of an explicit service request or discarding of user-to-user information as described in 1.1.5.x.5.2/Q.737?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT support the rejection procedure of an explicit service request or discarding of user-to-user information as described in 1.1.5.x.5.2/Q.737?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 11, Item 2
		*/
		boolean PC_SUPP_REJ_UUI_Q737;

		/* @desc Does the SUT reject a user-to-user request service 3 not essential after call set-up using the FRJ message?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT reject a user-to-user request service 3 not essential after call set-up using the FRJ message?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 11, Item 3
		*/
		boolean PC_REJ_UUS3ESSENTIAL_FRJ;

		// ECT Table 12
		/* @desc Does the SUT return a LOP (response) message with the indication "insufficient information"?
		/**
		* @desc Does the SUT return a LOP (response) message with the indication "insufficient information"?
		** @remark PICS Reference: Table 12, Item 1
		*/
		boolean PC_RET_LOP_INSUFF;