Loading crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86_64.pl +3 −3 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ # Westmere 1.76(+14%) # Sandy Bridge 1.79(+9%) # Ivy Bridge 1.79(+8%) # Haswell 0.55(+93%) (if system doesn't support AVX) # Bulldozer 1.52(+25%) # March 2013 Loading @@ -70,9 +71,8 @@ # suggested by Shay Gueron[1]. Even though contemporary AVX-capable # CPUs such as Sandy and Ivy Bridge can execute it, the code performs # sub-optimally in comparison to above mentioned version. But thanks # to Ilya Albrekht and Max Locktyukhin of Intel Corp. we know that # it will perform better on upcoming Haswell processor. [Exact # performance numbers to be added at launch.] # to Ilya Albrekht and Max Locktyukhin of Intel Corp. we knew that # it performs in 0.41 cycles per byte on Haswell processor. # # [1] http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2900&user=guest&pass=guest Loading Loading
crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86_64.pl +3 −3 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ # Westmere 1.76(+14%) # Sandy Bridge 1.79(+9%) # Ivy Bridge 1.79(+8%) # Haswell 0.55(+93%) (if system doesn't support AVX) # Bulldozer 1.52(+25%) # March 2013 Loading @@ -70,9 +71,8 @@ # suggested by Shay Gueron[1]. Even though contemporary AVX-capable # CPUs such as Sandy and Ivy Bridge can execute it, the code performs # sub-optimally in comparison to above mentioned version. But thanks # to Ilya Albrekht and Max Locktyukhin of Intel Corp. we know that # it will perform better on upcoming Haswell processor. [Exact # performance numbers to be added at launch.] # to Ilya Albrekht and Max Locktyukhin of Intel Corp. we knew that # it performs in 0.41 cycles per byte on Haswell processor. # # [1] http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2900&user=guest&pass=guest Loading