x86_64 assembly pack: add Goldmont performance results.

# Haswell	4.44/0.63	0.63	0.73	0.63	0.70

# Skylake	2.62/0.63	0.63	0.63	0.63

# Silvermont	5.75/3.54	3.56	4.12	3.87(*)	4.11

# Goldmont	3.82/1.26	1.26	1.29	1.29	1.50

# Bulldozer	5.77/0.70	0.72	0.90	0.70	0.95

#

# (*)	Atom Silvermont ECB result is suboptimal because of penalties

# Nehalem(**) 	7.63		6.88		+11%

# Atom	    	17.1		16.4		+4%

# Silvermont	-		12.9

# Goldmont	-		8.85

#

# (*)	Comparison is not completely fair, because "this" is ECB,

#	i.e. no extra processing such as counter values calculation

# Nehalem	7.80

# Atom		17.9

# Silvermont	14.0

# Goldmont	10.2

#

# November 2011.

#

# Nehalem	29.6/40.3/14.6		10.0/11.8

# Atom		57.3/74.2/32.1		60.9/77.2(***)

# Silvermont	52.7/64.0/19.5		48.8/60.8(***)

# Goldmont	38.9/49.0/17.8		10.6/12.6

#

# (*)	"Hyper-threading" in the context refers rather to cache shared

#	among multiple cores, than to specifically Intel HTT. As vast

# Sandy Bridge	10.5/+47%	3.20

# Haswell	8.15/+50%	2.83

# Silvermont	17.4/+36%	8.35

# Goldmont	13.4/+40%	4.36

# Sledgehammer	10.2/+54%

# Bulldozer	13.4/+50%	4.38(*)

#

# Ivy Bridge	6.71/+46%	5.40/6.49	2.41

# Haswell	5.92/+43%	5.20/6.45	2.42	    1.23

# Silvermont	12.0/+33%	7.75/7.40	7.03(iii)

# Goldmont	10.6/+17%	5.10/-		3.28

# Sledgehammer	7.28/+52%	-/14.2(ii)	-

# Bulldozer	9.66/+28%	9.85/11.1	3.06(iv)

# VIA Nano	10.5/+46%	6.72/8.60	6.05