Commit 72f6453c authored by Dr. Stephen Henson's avatar Dr. Stephen Henson
Browse files

PR: 1835 

Submitted by: Damien Miller <djm@mindrot.org>
Approved by: steve@openssl.org

Fix various typos.
parent eca7b907

MacOS/GetHTTPS.src/ErrorHandling.hpp

+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ OSErr AppendErrorMessageToHandle(Handle inoutHandle); 






//	A bunch of evil macros that would be uneccessary if I were always using C++ !

//	A bunch of evil macros that would be unnecessary if I were always using C++ !



#define SetErrorMessageAndBailIfNil(theArg,theMessage)								\

{																					\

crypto/asn1/a_bytes.c

+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ ASN1_STRING *d2i_ASN1_type_bytes(ASN1_STRING **a, const unsigned char **pp, 


	if (tag >= 32)

		{

		i=ASN1_R_TAG_VALUE_TOO_HIGH;;

		i=ASN1_R_TAG_VALUE_TOO_HIGH;

		goto err;

		}

	if (!(ASN1_tag2bit(tag) & type))

crypto/asn1/t_x509.c

+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ int X509_signature_print(BIO *bp, X509_ALGOR *sigalg, ASN1_STRING *sig) 
int ASN1_STRING_print(BIO *bp, ASN1_STRING *v)

	{

	int i,n;

	char buf[80],*p;;

	char buf[80],*p;



	if (v == NULL) return(0);

	n=0;

crypto/bn/bntest.c

+2 −2
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ int test_mod_exp(BIO *bp, BN_CTX *ctx) 
		BN_bntest_rand(b,2+i,0,0); /**/



		if (!BN_mod_exp(d,a,b,c,ctx))

			return(00);

			return(0);



		if (bp != NULL)

			{
@@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@ int test_exp(BIO *bp, BN_CTX *ctx) 
		BN_bntest_rand(b,2+i,0,0); /**/



		if (!BN_exp(d,a,b,ctx))

			return(00);

			return(0);



		if (bp != NULL)

			{

crypto/des/times/usparc.cc

+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ solaris 2.5.1 usparc 167mhz?? - SC4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5 


For the ultra sparc, SunC 4.0 cc -fast -Xa -xO5, running 'des_opts'

gives a speed of 475,000 des/s while 'speed' gives 417,000 des/s.

I belive the difference is tied up in optimisation that the compiler

I believe the difference is tied up in optimisation that the compiler

is able to perform when the code is 'inlined'.  For 'speed', the DES

routines are being linked from a library.  I'll record the higher

speed since if performance is everything, you can always inline