Commit 4f469342 authored by Andy Polyakov's avatar Andy Polyakov
Browse files

Depict future Win64/x64 development.

parent fabe640f
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+117 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -576,3 +576,120 @@ close STDOUT;
#	movq	16(%rsp),%rsi
# endif
#	ret
#
#################################################
# Unlike on Unix systems(*) lack of Win64 stack unwinding information
# has undesired side-effect at run-time: if an exception is raised in
# assembler subroutine such as those in question (basically we're
# referring to segmentation violations caused by malformed input
# parameters), the application is briskly terminated without invoking
# any exception handlers, most notably without generating memory dump
# or any user notification whatsoever. This poses a problem. It's
# possible to address it by registering custom language-specific
# handler that would restore processor context to the state at
# subroutine entry point and return "exception is not handled, keep
# unwinding" code. Writing such handler can be a challenge... But it's
# doable, though requires certain coding convention. Consider following
# snippet:
#
# function:
#	movq	%rsp,%rax	# copy rsp to volatile register
#	pushq	%r15		# save non-volatile registers
#	pushq	%rbx
#	pushq	%rbp
#	movq	%rsp,%r11
#	subq	%rdi,%r11	# prepare [variable] stack frame
#	andq	$-64,%r11
#	movq	%rax,0(%r11)	# check for exceptions
#	movq	%r11,%rsp	# allocate [variable] stack frame
#	movq	%rax,0(%rsp)	# save original rsp value
# magic_point:
#	...
#	movq	0(%rsp),%rcx	# pull original rsp value
#	movq	-24(%rcx),%rbp	# restore non-volatile registers
#	movq	-16(%rcx),%rbx
#	movq	-8(%rcx),%r15
#	movq	%rcx,%rsp	# restore original rsp
#	ret
#
# The key is that up to magic_point copy of original rsp value remains
# in chosen volatile register and no non-volatile register, except for
# rsp, is modified. While past magic_point rsp remains constant till
# the very end of the function. In this case custom language-specific
# exception handler would look like this:
#
# EXCEPTION_DISPOSITION handler (EXCEPTION_RECORD *rec,ULONG64 frame,
#		CONTEXT *context,DISPATCHER_CONTEXT *disp)
# {	ULONG64 *rsp;
#	if (context->Rip<magic_point)
#	    rsp = (ULONG64 *)context->Rax;
#	else
#	{   rsp = ((ULONG64 **)context->Rsp)[0];
#	    context->Rbp = rsp[-3];
#	    context->Rbx = rsp[-2];
#	    context->R15 = rsp[-1];
#	}
#	context->Rsp = (ULONG64)rsp;
#	context->Rdi = rsp[1];
#	context->Rsi = rsp[2];
#
#	memcpy (disp->ContextRecord,context,sizeof(CONTEXT));
#	RtlVirtualUnwind(UNW_FLAG_NHANDLER,disp->ImageBase,
#		dips->ControlPc,disp->FunctionEntry,disp->ContextRecord,
#		&disp->HandlerData,&disp->EstablisherFrame,NULL);
#	return ExceptionContinueSearch;
# }
#
# It's appropriate to implement this handler in assembler, directly in
# function's module. In order to do that one has to know members'
# offsets in CONTEXT and DISPATCHER_CONTEXT structures and some constant
# values. Here they are:
#
#	CONTEXT.Rax				120
#	CONTEXT.Rcx				128
#	CONTEXT.Rdx				136
#	CONTEXT.Rbx				144
#	CONTEXT.Rsp				152
#	CONTEXT.Rbp				160
#	CONTEXT.Rsi				168
#	CONTEXT.Rdi				176
#	CONTEXT.R8				184
#	CONTEXT.R9				192
#	CONTEXT.R10				200
#	CONTEXT.R11				208
#	CONTEXT.R12				216
#	CONTEXT.R13				224
#	CONTEXT.R14				232
#	CONTEXT.R15				240
#	CONTEXT.Rip				248
#	sizeof(CONTEXT)				1232
#	DISPATCHER_CONTEXT.ControlPc		0
#	DISPATCHER_CONTEXT.ImageBase		8
#	DISPATCHER_CONTEXT.FunctionEntry	16
#	DISPATCHER_CONTEXT.EstablisherFrame	24
#	DISPATCHER_CONTEXT.TargetIp		32
#	DISPATCHER_CONTEXT.ContextRecord	40
#	DISPATCHER_CONTEXT.LanguageHandler	48
#	DISPATCHER_CONTEXT.HandlerData		56
#	UNW_FLAG_NHANDLER			0
#	ExceptionContinueSearch			1
#
# UNWIND_INFO structure for .xdata segment would be
#	DB	9,0,0,0
#	DD	imagerel handler
# denoting exception handler for a function with zero-length prologue,
# no stack frame or frame register.
#
# P.S.	Attentive reader can notice that effectively no exceptions are
#	expected in "gear" prologue and epilogue [discussed in "ABI
#	cross-reference" above]. No, there are not. This is because if
#	memory area used by them was subject to segmentation violation,
#	then exception would be raised upon call to our function and be
#	accounted to caller and unwound from its frame, which is not a
#	problem.
#
# (*)	Note that we're talking about run-time, not debug-time. Lack of
#	unwind information makes debugging hard on both Windows and
#	Unix. "Unlike" referes to the fact that on Unix signal handler
#	will always be invoked, core dumped and appropriate exit code
#	returned to parent (for user notification).