Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit ea4cd4d8 authored by Daniel Stenberg's avatar Daniel Stenberg
Browse files

-Wno-format-nonliteral does not exist in my gcc 2.96, only use that with

newer versions
parent c7775c59
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -1203,7 +1203,7 @@ AC_HELP_STRING([--disable-debug],[Disable debug options]),
dnl we only like gcc less than 5.0, since if it is above that it is
dnl likely just a compiler that looks like gcc (like icc 8.0)!
dnl here's the standard setup
WARN="-W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-format-nonliteral -Wundef -Wpointer-arith -Wnested-externs -Winline -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wsign-compare"
WARN="-W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wpointer-arith -Wnested-externs -Winline -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wsign-compare"
dnl -Wcast-align is a bit too annoying ;-)
......@@ -1211,6 +1211,11 @@ AC_HELP_STRING([--disable-debug],[Disable debug options]),
dnl gcc 2.96 or later
WARN="$WARN -Wfloat-equal"
if test "$gccnum" -gt "296"; then
dnl this option does not exist in 2.96
WARN="$WARN -Wno-format-nonliteral"
fi
dnl -Wunreachable-code seems totally unreliable on my gcc 3.3.2 on
dnl on i686-Linux as it gives us heaps with false positives
if test "$gccnum" -ge "303"; then
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment