Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit d26cfd57 authored by Daniel Stenberg's avatar Daniel Stenberg
Browse files

skip the test of "2094 Nov 6" for now, since the 64bit time_t systems return

different values for it...
parent b7ffc6bb
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -47,6 +47,13 @@ nothing
19: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 21:32:11 +0200 => 1094931131
20: 20040912 15:05:58 -0700 => 1095026758
21: 20040911 +0200 => 1094853600
22: 2094 Nov 6 => 2147483647
</stdout>
# This test case previously testes an overflow case ("2094 Nov 6 =>
# 2147483647") for 32bit time_t, but since some systems have 64bit time_t and
# handles this (returning 3939840000), and some 64bit-time_t systems don't
# handle this and returns -1 for this, it turned very tricky to write a fine
# test case and thus it is now removed until we have a way to write test cases
# for this kind of things.
</verify>
......@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ const char *dates[]={
"Sat, 11 Sep 2004 21:32:11 +0200",
"20040912 15:05:58 -0700",
"20040911 +0200",
"2094 Nov 6",
/* "2094 Nov 6", See ../data/test517 for details */
NULL
};
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment