Loading STATUS +8 −0 Changes for STATUS: 8 added lines, 0 removed lines. Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -260,6 +260,14 @@ PATCHES TO BACKPORT FROM 2.1 +1: stoddard, striker, jim -1: brianp (we need a more robust solution than what's in 2.1 right now), jerenkrantz (should be fixed, but I don't have time to do this) trawick: Reviewing the thread in Dec '02, I don't see any proposal about more robust solutions once it was made clear that Connection: Close can't be used. If Justin is correct in his assertion that many servers don't handle TE: chunked, then the current solution is reasonable. If Justin is incorrect in that assertion, then something more robust is possible, such as buffering up to N bytes in hopes of reading the entire body, before deciding to send C-L or T-E: chunked. Alternate recollections? * Allow mod_dav to do weak entity comparison functions. modules/dav/main/util.c: r1.45 Loading Loading
STATUS +8 −0 Changes for STATUS: 8 added lines, 0 removed lines. Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -260,6 +260,14 @@ PATCHES TO BACKPORT FROM 2.1 +1: stoddard, striker, jim -1: brianp (we need a more robust solution than what's in 2.1 right now), jerenkrantz (should be fixed, but I don't have time to do this) trawick: Reviewing the thread in Dec '02, I don't see any proposal about more robust solutions once it was made clear that Connection: Close can't be used. If Justin is correct in his assertion that many servers don't handle TE: chunked, then the current solution is reasonable. If Justin is incorrect in that assertion, then something more robust is possible, such as buffering up to N bytes in hopes of reading the entire body, before deciding to send C-L or T-E: chunked. Alternate recollections? * Allow mod_dav to do weak entity comparison functions. modules/dav/main/util.c: r1.45 Loading