Loading STATUS +15 −15 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -192,21 +192,6 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: (merge without changes to motorz) +1: ylavic, jim *) mod_journald: Add new module mod_journald to log error logs into journald. trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1610339 http://svn.apache.org/r1621806 http://svn.apache.org/r1812339 2.4.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~jkaluza/patches/httpd-2.4.x-mod_journald.patch http://svn.apache.org/r1812339 +1: jkaluza, jim jchampion: Looks like the headers require GCC extensions to compile, so mod_journald can't be configured in maintainer mode (-std=c89). Can anyone else reproduce, or is it just my distro? ylavic: missing r1812339 for maintainer-mode/c89/-Werror compliance, needed if the above configure.in proposal gets backported. Note that r1812339 could be backported in any case, even if the above configure.in proposal does not get accepted. *) mpm_event: avoid a very unlikely race condition between the listener and the workers when the latter fails to add a connection to the pollset. trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1809273 Loading Loading @@ -509,4 +494,19 @@ PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED -1: wrowe (blocking will break "working" .conf files on a subversion update meant to pick up security fixes. "Alerting" I would agree to.) *) mod_journald: Add new module mod_journald to log error logs into journald. trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1610339 http://svn.apache.org/r1621806 http://svn.apache.org/r1812339 2.4.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~jkaluza/patches/httpd-2.4.x-mod_journald.patch http://svn.apache.org/r1812339 +1: jkaluza, jim jchampion: Looks like the headers require GCC extensions to compile, so mod_journald can't be configured in maintainer mode (-std=c89). Can anyone else reproduce, or is it just my distro? ylavic: missing r1812339 for maintainer-mode/c89/-Werror compliance, needed if the above configure.in proposal gets backported. Note that r1812339 could be backported in any case, even if the above configure.in proposal does not get accepted. Loading
STATUS +15 −15 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -192,21 +192,6 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: (merge without changes to motorz) +1: ylavic, jim *) mod_journald: Add new module mod_journald to log error logs into journald. trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1610339 http://svn.apache.org/r1621806 http://svn.apache.org/r1812339 2.4.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~jkaluza/patches/httpd-2.4.x-mod_journald.patch http://svn.apache.org/r1812339 +1: jkaluza, jim jchampion: Looks like the headers require GCC extensions to compile, so mod_journald can't be configured in maintainer mode (-std=c89). Can anyone else reproduce, or is it just my distro? ylavic: missing r1812339 for maintainer-mode/c89/-Werror compliance, needed if the above configure.in proposal gets backported. Note that r1812339 could be backported in any case, even if the above configure.in proposal does not get accepted. *) mpm_event: avoid a very unlikely race condition between the listener and the workers when the latter fails to add a connection to the pollset. trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1809273 Loading Loading @@ -509,4 +494,19 @@ PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED -1: wrowe (blocking will break "working" .conf files on a subversion update meant to pick up security fixes. "Alerting" I would agree to.) *) mod_journald: Add new module mod_journald to log error logs into journald. trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1610339 http://svn.apache.org/r1621806 http://svn.apache.org/r1812339 2.4.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~jkaluza/patches/httpd-2.4.x-mod_journald.patch http://svn.apache.org/r1812339 +1: jkaluza, jim jchampion: Looks like the headers require GCC extensions to compile, so mod_journald can't be configured in maintainer mode (-std=c89). Can anyone else reproduce, or is it just my distro? ylavic: missing r1812339 for maintainer-mode/c89/-Werror compliance, needed if the above configure.in proposal gets backported. Note that r1812339 could be backported in any case, even if the above configure.in proposal does not get accepted.