Loading STATUS +0 −11 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -141,17 +141,6 @@ PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: 2.4.x patch: svn merge -c 1829513 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk . +1: jorton, jim, ylavic *) core: use strncmp in check_errorlog_dir and core_dump_config when checking if the ErrorLog directive is configured with the 'syslog' prefix. PR 62102 trunk patch: none, as far as I can see the code in trunk diverged too much due to the code in STALLED for ap_errorlog_provider. 2.4.x patch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/patches/2.4.x/core-check_errorlog_dir_syslog.patch +1: elukey, jhriggs, ylavic jhriggs: As discussed on dev@, there is a potential regression/config-break with this if someone uses "SYSLOG" rather than "syslog" in the config, but I think the risk is minimal/nonexistent and acceptable. +1 PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ] Loading Loading
STATUS +0 −11 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -141,17 +141,6 @@ PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: 2.4.x patch: svn merge -c 1829513 ^/httpd/httpd/trunk . +1: jorton, jim, ylavic *) core: use strncmp in check_errorlog_dir and core_dump_config when checking if the ErrorLog directive is configured with the 'syslog' prefix. PR 62102 trunk patch: none, as far as I can see the code in trunk diverged too much due to the code in STALLED for ap_errorlog_provider. 2.4.x patch: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/patches/2.4.x/core-check_errorlog_dir_syslog.patch +1: elukey, jhriggs, ylavic jhriggs: As discussed on dev@, there is a potential regression/config-break with this if someone uses "SYSLOG" rather than "syslog" in the config, but I think the risk is minimal/nonexistent and acceptable. +1 PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ] Loading