Loading STATUS +4 −3 Changes for STATUS: 4 added lines, 3 removed lines. Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -129,7 +129,8 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=607282&view=rev Backport version for 2.0.x of patch: http://awe.com/e8f6ad05238f8/CVE-2007-6388-httpd-2.x.patch +1: rpluem, fuankg +1: rpluem, fuankg, wrowe wrowe is +1 for having that default to a value of 10 instead of 1 @ln# 307 PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: [ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ] Loading @@ -145,7 +146,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: nobody can actually remember why this limitation was introduced at all (r94028) and the mailing list archives also gave no hint. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=327179 +0: covener +0: covener, wrowe do we need to make people opt-in for this behavior to backport it to 2.0.x? What mechanism? Loading @@ -163,7 +164,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=164538 Backport version for 2.0.x of patch: http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/diffs/httpd-2.0.x-ap_vhost_iterate_given_conn.diff +1: fuankg +1: fuankg, wrowe PATCHES TO BACKPORT THAT ARE ON HOLD OR NOT GOING ANYWHERE SOON: Loading Loading
STATUS +4 −3 Changes for STATUS: 4 added lines, 3 removed lines. Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -129,7 +129,8 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=607282&view=rev Backport version for 2.0.x of patch: http://awe.com/e8f6ad05238f8/CVE-2007-6388-httpd-2.x.patch +1: rpluem, fuankg +1: rpluem, fuankg, wrowe wrowe is +1 for having that default to a value of 10 instead of 1 @ln# 307 PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: [ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ] Loading @@ -145,7 +146,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: nobody can actually remember why this limitation was introduced at all (r94028) and the mailing list archives also gave no hint. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=327179 +0: covener +0: covener, wrowe do we need to make people opt-in for this behavior to backport it to 2.0.x? What mechanism? Loading @@ -163,7 +164,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=164538 Backport version for 2.0.x of patch: http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/diffs/httpd-2.0.x-ap_vhost_iterate_given_conn.diff +1: fuankg +1: fuankg, wrowe PATCHES TO BACKPORT THAT ARE ON HOLD OR NOT GOING ANYWHERE SOON: Loading