Commit 7d02f310 authored by Ruediger Pluem's avatar Ruediger Pluem
Browse files

* Vote, promote, comment 


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x@539117 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
parent ccbb2788

STATUS

+12 −9
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -105,6 +105,15 @@ PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: 
     http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=520733

     +1: wrowe, rpluem, niq



   * mod_disk_cache: Allow Vary'd content to be refreshed properly.

     Trunk version of patch:

       http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=538992

       http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=538997

       http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=539054

     2.2.x version of patch:

       (Applies cleanly)

     +1: jerenkrantz, fielding, rpluem



PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:



    * ApacheMonitor: Fix Windows Vista detection.
@@ -259,15 +268,9 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: 
                  Otherwise +1.

     jerenkrantz: As I replied, I don't care either way.  I was just trying to

                  minimize the delta against 2.2.x.



   * mod_disk_cache: Allow Vary'd content to be refreshed properly.

     Trunk version of patch:

       http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=538992

       http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=538997

       http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=539054

     2.2.x version of patch:

       (Applies cleanly)

     +1: jerenkrantz, fielding

     rpluem     : Now that CacheIgnoreQueryString has been backported r538807

                  applies cleanly to 2.2.x. So I assume it is ok to use

                  r538807 instead of max-age-2.2.x.patch.



   * mod_cache: Let Cache-Control max-age set the expiration date.

     Trunk version of patch: