Loading STATUS +8 −5 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -137,12 +137,15 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: +1: rjung -1: wrowe [it doesn't seem appropriate to add the alternate, less secure template to a branch which people shouldn't be deploying in the first place. I'm +1 on the -SSLv2 change alone, e.g. http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/2.0-ssl-noV2.patch ] the first place. See simplified and more complete proposal below] * Alternate: -SSLv2, Simplify SSLCipherSuite, corresponding docs fix, MSIE downgrade changes r966160, r1135234, r1203752, r966055, r1132793 http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/https-std-2.0.patch +1: wrowe * Alternate: -SSLv2 change alone http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/2.0-ssl-noV2.patch +1: wrowe, trawick PATCHES TO BACKPORT THAT ARE ON HOLD OR NOT GOING ANYWHERE SOON: Loading Loading
STATUS +8 −5 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -137,12 +137,15 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: +1: rjung -1: wrowe [it doesn't seem appropriate to add the alternate, less secure template to a branch which people shouldn't be deploying in the first place. I'm +1 on the -SSLv2 change alone, e.g. http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/2.0-ssl-noV2.patch ] the first place. See simplified and more complete proposal below] * Alternate: -SSLv2, Simplify SSLCipherSuite, corresponding docs fix, MSIE downgrade changes r966160, r1135234, r1203752, r966055, r1132793 http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/https-std-2.0.patch +1: wrowe * Alternate: -SSLv2 change alone http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/2.0-ssl-noV2.patch +1: wrowe, trawick PATCHES TO BACKPORT THAT ARE ON HOLD OR NOT GOING ANYWHERE SOON: Loading