Commit 56133a94 authored by Jeff Trawick's avatar Jeff Trawick
Browse files

relatively new mod_reqtimeout needs to get in sync with various trunk fixes 


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x@1005646 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
parent 04221eb3

STATUS

+14 −14
Changes for STATUS: 14 added lines, 14 removed lines.
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -103,20 +103,6 @@ PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: 
      http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/201010.mbox/%3C20101007095048.GA5423@redhat.com%3E

      [/NOT/i redundant]



PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:

  [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]



 * unixd: set suexec_enabled correctly when httpd is run by non-root

   PR 42175

   Trunk Patch: http://cvs.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=791337

   2.2.x Patch: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20004

   +1: niq

   -0: wrowe; Please refer to man 'access' BUGS section about linux 2.4 

              vs 2.6 kernels, potentially a suspect test for root.

   sf:        Couldn't the linux 2.4 bug be worked around by calling access

              twice? Once with R_OK and once with X_OK.

   wrowe:     It would seem we only need to test for X_OK?



  * mod_req-timeout/core: Backport bugfixes from trunk up to r935339:

    - Do not wrongly enforce timeouts for mod_proxy's backend

      connections and other protocol handlers (like mod_ftp).
@@ -146,6 +132,20 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: 
    combined 2.2.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~sf/mod_reqtimeout-2.2.x-v3.diff

    +1: sf, wrowe



 PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:

  [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]



 * unixd: set suexec_enabled correctly when httpd is run by non-root

   PR 42175

   Trunk Patch: http://cvs.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=791337

   2.2.x Patch: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20004

   +1: niq

   -0: wrowe; Please refer to man 'access' BUGS section about linux 2.4 

              vs 2.6 kernels, potentially a suspect test for root.

   sf:        Couldn't the linux 2.4 bug be worked around by calling access

              twice? Once with R_OK and once with X_OK.

   wrowe:     It would seem we only need to test for X_OK?



 * mod_disk_cache: Decline the opportunity to cache if the response is

    a 206 Partial Content. This stops a reverse proxied partial response

    from becoming cached, and then being served in subsequent responses.