Loading STATUS +0 −14 Changes for STATUS: 0 added lines, 14 removed lines. Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -147,20 +147,6 @@ RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: is set. If not, it means that the HEAD requests don't generate the same headers as a GET which is wrong. * HP/UX 10.20: compile breakage in APR. Looks like it should be easy to fix, probably just some extraneous #include's that are fouling things up. PR: 9457 Jeff: See my reply and patch in the PR (and previous commit to stop using "pipe" as a field name). If patch is committed, we should be okay. I'll wait to see if the user tests the patch. Update by Jeff 20020722: I got an account on HP 10.20. It looks like some of the APR thread detection is screwed up. If we find pthread.h but we can't compile the pthread test program we still think we can use threads. For that reason, the patch I posted to the PR won't work as-is since a failed compile of the test program means nothing. * exec cmd and suexec arg-passing enhancements Status: Patches proposed Message-ID: <20020526041748.A29148@prodigy.Redbrick.DCU.IE> Loading Loading
STATUS +0 −14 Changes for STATUS: 0 added lines, 14 removed lines. Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -147,20 +147,6 @@ RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: is set. If not, it means that the HEAD requests don't generate the same headers as a GET which is wrong. * HP/UX 10.20: compile breakage in APR. Looks like it should be easy to fix, probably just some extraneous #include's that are fouling things up. PR: 9457 Jeff: See my reply and patch in the PR (and previous commit to stop using "pipe" as a field name). If patch is committed, we should be okay. I'll wait to see if the user tests the patch. Update by Jeff 20020722: I got an account on HP 10.20. It looks like some of the APR thread detection is screwed up. If we find pthread.h but we can't compile the pthread test program we still think we can use threads. For that reason, the patch I posted to the PR won't work as-is since a failed compile of the test program means nothing. * exec cmd and suexec arg-passing enhancements Status: Patches proposed Message-ID: <20020526041748.A29148@prodigy.Redbrick.DCU.IE> Loading