Loading STATUS +4 −1 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: trawick: +1 to rjung's idea; excellent plan ylavic: +1 too, but maybe use %{fmt}T instead? We already either "loose" %T or %D since %{s} = %T and %{us} = %D, T for Time (taken) is maybe more meaningful? rjung: I already went with %D (*d*uration) ... See the proposed backport further down. rjung: It seems most prefer the %{...}T variant. I'll switch to that. ylavic: OK, not a strong opinion either... Added a comment below too :) * mpm_winnt service.c: Accept utf-8 service names/descriptions for i18n. Loading Loading @@ -169,6 +169,9 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: 2.2.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/httpd-2.2.x-mod_log_config-duration_units.patch +1: rjung ylavic: Can't we backport the whole r979120+r1467765 while at it? rjung: Sure that would be useful. In light of logjam I would hope to not defer the next release to much, so we should IMHO propose that bigger change independently and on top of this small and easy to review one. PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED Loading Loading
STATUS +4 −1 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: trawick: +1 to rjung's idea; excellent plan ylavic: +1 too, but maybe use %{fmt}T instead? We already either "loose" %T or %D since %{s} = %T and %{us} = %D, T for Time (taken) is maybe more meaningful? rjung: I already went with %D (*d*uration) ... See the proposed backport further down. rjung: It seems most prefer the %{...}T variant. I'll switch to that. ylavic: OK, not a strong opinion either... Added a comment below too :) * mpm_winnt service.c: Accept utf-8 service names/descriptions for i18n. Loading Loading @@ -169,6 +169,9 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: 2.2.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/httpd-2.2.x-mod_log_config-duration_units.patch +1: rjung ylavic: Can't we backport the whole r979120+r1467765 while at it? rjung: Sure that would be useful. In light of logjam I would hope to not defer the next release to much, so we should IMHO propose that bigger change independently and on top of this small and easy to review one. PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED Loading