Commit 0ae73402 authored by Ralf S. Engelschall's avatar Ralf S. Engelschall
Browse files

Merged in recent changes from HEAD.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/APACHE_1_2_X@78872 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
parent 8f431cf4
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+40 −31
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
  <!--#include virtual="header.html" -->
  <H1 ALIGN="CENTER">Apache Server Frequently Asked Questions</H1>
  <P>
  $Revision: 1.63.2.13 $ ($Date: 1997/07/31 08:57:21 $)
  $Revision: 1.63.2.14 $ ($Date: 1997/08/03 08:47:57 $)
  </P>
  <P>
  The latest version of this FAQ is always available from the main
@@ -218,12 +218,12 @@
   <LI><A HREF="#linux-shmget">When I run it under Linux I get "shmget:
    function not found", what should I do?</A>
   </LI>
   <LI><A HREF="#authauthoritative">Why does my authentification give
   <LI><A HREF="#authauthoritative">Why does my authentication give
    me a server error?</A>
   <LI><A HREF="#auth-on-same-machine">Do I have to keep the (mSQL)
    authentification information on the same machine?</A>
    authentication information on the same machine?</A>
   </LI>
   <LI><A HREF="#msql-slow">Why is my mSQL authentification terribly slow?</A>
   <LI><A HREF="#msql-slow">Why is my mSQL authentication terribly slow?</A>
   </LI>
   <LI><A HREF="#rewrite-more-config">Where can I find mod_rewrite rulesets
    which already solve particular URL-related problems?</A>
@@ -685,7 +685,7 @@
  This is generally only necessary when you are calling external
  programs from your script that send output to stdout, or if there will
  be a long delay between the time the headers are sent and the actual
  content starts being emitted.  To maximise performance, you should
  content starts being emitted.  To maximize performance, you should
  turn buffer-flushing back <EM>off</EM> (with <CODE>$| = 0</CODE> or the
  equivalent) after the statements that send the headers, as displayed
  above.
@@ -944,32 +944,41 @@
      <STRONG>Can I increase <SAMP>FD_SETSIZE</SAMP> on FreeBSD?</STRONG>
     </A>
  <P>
  On versions of FreeBSD older than 2.2 <SAMP>FD_SETSIZE</SAMP>, which
  limits the number of open files on the system, is controlled by a
  kernel option and is limited to 256.  You can set this value using a
  line such as the following in your kernel configuration file:
  On versions of FreeBSD before 3.0, the <SAMP>FD_SETSIZE</SAMP> define 
  defaults to 256.  This means that you will have trouble usefully using
  more than 256 file descriptors in Apache.  This can be increased, but
  doing so can be tricky.

  If you are using a version prior to 2.2, you need to recompile your
  kernel with a larger FD_SETSIZE.  This can be done by adding a 
  line such as:
  </P>
  <DL>
   <DD><CODE>options FD_SETSIZE <EM>nnn</EM></CODE>
   </DD>
  </DL>
  <P>
  This can restrict the number of
  virtual hosts you can use, especially if they all use different log
  files.  Increasing this limit (and recompiling Apache) is not enough,
  as it is on some platforms (such as Solaris), as you also will have
  to recompile <SAMP>libc</SAMP> with the changed setting.
  To your kernel config file.  Starting at version 2.2, this is no
  longer necessary.
  </P>
  <P>
  With FreeBSD 2.2 and later, you <EM>can</EM> increase the setting of
  <SAMP>FD_SETSIZE</SAMP> at Apache compilation time by adding
  &quot;<SAMP>-DFD_SETSIZE=<EM>nnn</EM></SAMP>&quot; to the
  <SAMP>EXTRA_CFLAGS</SAMP> line in your <SAMP>Configuration</SAMP>
  file.
  If you are using a version of 2.1-stable from after 1997/03/10 or
  2.2 or 3.0-current from before 1997/06/28, there is a limit in
  the resolver library that prevents it from using more file descriptors
  than what FD_SETSIZE is set to when libc is compiled.  To increase
  this, you have to recompile libc with a higher FD_SETSIZE.
  </P>
  <P>
  On FreeBSD 3.0 the default is 1024, so the problem is lessened still
  more, and may not require any intervention at all.
  In FreeBSD 3.0, the default FD_SETSIZE has been increased to
  1024 and the above limitation in the resolver library
  has been removed.
  </P>
  <P>
  After you deal with the appropriate changes above, you can increase 
  the setting of <SAMP>FD_SETSIZE</SAMP> at Apache compilation time 
  by adding &quot;<SAMP>-DFD_SETSIZE=<EM>nnn</EM></SAMP>&quot; to the
  <SAMP>EXTRA_CFLAGS</SAMP> line in your <SAMP>Configuration</SAMP>
  file.
  </P>
  <HR>
 </LI>
@@ -1229,7 +1238,7 @@
     </A>
  <P>
  This is a normal message and nothing about which to be alarmed.  It simply
  means that the client cancelled the connection before it had been
  means that the client canceled the connection before it had been
  completely set up - such as by the end-user pressing the &quot;Stop&quot;
  button.  People's patience being what it is, sites with response-time
  problems or slow network links may experiences this more than
@@ -1779,13 +1788,13 @@
  <HR>
 </LI>
 <LI><A NAME="authauthoritative">
      <STRONG>Why does my authentification give me a server error?</STRONG>
      <STRONG>Why does my authentication give me a server error?</STRONG>
     </A>
  <P>
  Under normal circumstances, the Apache access control modules will
  pass unrecognized user IDs on to the next access control module in
  line.  Only if the user ID is recognized and the password is validated
  (or not) will it give the usual success or &quot;authentification
  (or not) will it give the usual success or &quot;authentication
  failed&quot; messages.
  </P>
  <P>
@@ -1821,7 +1830,7 @@
  <SAMP>mod_auth_mysql</SAMP>, <SAMP>mod_auth_anon</SAMP> or
  <SAMP>mod_auth_cookie</SAMP> modules on their own.  These are by
  default <STRONG>not</STRONG> authoritative, and this will pass the
  buck on to the (non-existent) next authentification module when the
  buck on to the (non-existent) next authentication module when the
  user ID is not in their respective database.  Just add the appropriate
  '<SAMP><EM>XXX</EM>Authoritative yes</SAMP>' line to the configuration.
  </P>
@@ -1835,11 +1844,11 @@
  <HR>
 </LI>
 <LI><A NAME="auth-on-same-machine">
      <STRONG>Do I have to keep the (mSQL) authentification information
      <STRONG>Do I have to keep the (mSQL) authentication information
      on the same machine?</STRONG>
     </A>
  <P>
  Some organizations feel very strongly about keeping the authentification
  Some organizations feel very strongly about keeping the authentication
  information on a different machine than the webserver. With the
  <SAMP>mod_auth_msql</SAMP>, <SAMP>mod_auth_mysql</SAMP>, and other SQL
  modules connecting to (R)DBMses this is quite possible. Just configure
@@ -1855,10 +1864,10 @@
  <HR>
 </LI>
 <LI><A NAME="msql-slow">
      <STRONG>Why is my mSQL authentification terribly slow?</STRONG>
      <STRONG>Why is my mSQL authentication terribly slow?</STRONG>
     </A>
  <P>
  You have probably configured the Host by specificing a FQHN,
  You have probably configured the Host by specifying a FQHN,
  and thus the libmsql will use a full blown tcp/ip socket to talk to
  the database, rather than a fast internal device.  The
  <SAMP>libmsql</SAMP>, the mSQL FAQ, and the <SAMP>mod_auth_msql</SAMP>
@@ -1912,7 +1921,7 @@
  <A
      HREF="http://www.heise.de/ix/artikel/9612149/"
  >http://www.heise.de/ix/artikel/9612149/</A>,
  the english (translated) version can be found at 
  the English (translated) version can be found at 
  <A
      HREF="http://www.heise.de/ix/artikel/E/9612149/"
  >http://www.heise.de/ix/artikel/E/9612149/</A>.