{"swagger":"2.0","info":{"version":"1.0.0","title":"SOL005 - NSD Management Notification interface","description":"SOL005 - NSD Management Notification interface\n\nIMPORTANT: Please note that this file might be not aligned to the current version of the ETSI Group Specification it refers to. In case of discrepancies the published ETSI Group Specification takes precedence.\n\nIn clause 4.3.2 of ETSI GS NFV-SOL 002 v2.4.1, an attribute-based filtering mechanism is defined. This mechanism is currently not included in the corresponding OpenAPI design for this GS version. Changes to the attribute-based filtering mechanism are being considered in v2.5.1 of this GS for inclusion in the corresponding future ETSI NFV OpenAPI design.\nPlease report bugs to https://forge.etsi.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?component=Nfv-Openapis&list_id=61&product=NFV&resolution=\n","license":{"name":"ETSI Forge copyright notice","url":"https://forge.etsi.org/etsi-forge-copyright-notice.txt"}},"externalDocs":{"description":"ETSI GS NFV-SOL 005 V2.4.1","url":"http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_gs/NFV-SOL/001_099/005/02.04.01_60/gs_NFV-SOL005v020401p.pdf"},"basePath":"/callback/v1","schemes":["http","https"],"consumes":["application/json"],"produces":["application/json"],"paths":{"/URI_is_provided_by_the_client_when_creating_the_subscription-NsdOnBoardingNotification":{"parameters":[{"name":"Authorization","description":"The authorization token for the request. Reference: IETF RFC 7235.\n","in":"header","required":false,"type":"string"},{"name":"Version","description":"Version of the API requested to use when responding to this request.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"post":{"summary":"Notify about NSD and PNFD changes","description":"This resource represents a notification endpoint. The server can use this resource to send notifications to a subscribed client, which has provided the URI of this resource during the subscription process.\nThe POST method delivers a notification from the server to the client. This method shall support the URI query parameters, request and response data structures, and response codes, as specified in the Table 5.4.10.3.1-2.\n","parameters":[{"name":"NsdOnBoardingNotification","description":"A notification about the successful on-boarding of an NSD.\n","in":"body","required":true,"schema":{"type":"object","required":["_links","id","notificationType","subscriptionId","nsdId","nsdInfoId","timeStamp"],"properties":{"id":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"notificationType":{"type":"string","description":"Discriminator for the different notification types. Shall be set to \"NsdOnboardingNotification\" for this notification type.\n"},"subscriptionId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"timeStamp":{"description":"Date-time stamp.  Representation: String formatted according to IETF RFC 3339.\n","type":"string","format":"date-time"},"nsdInfoId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"nsdId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"_links":{"type":"object","required":["nsdInfo","subscription"],"properties":{"nsdInfo":{"description":"This type represents a link to a resource.\n","type":"object","required":["href"],"properties":{"href":{"description":"URI of the referenced resource.\n","type":"string","format":"url"}}},"subscription":{"description":"This type represents a link to a resource.\n","type":"object","required":["href"],"properties":{"href":{"description":"URI of the referenced resource.\n","type":"string","format":"url"}}}},"description":"This type represents the links to resources that an NSD management notification can contain.\n"}},"description":"This type represents an NSD management notification, which informs the receiver of the successful on-boarding of an NSD. It shall comply with the provisions defined in Table 5.5.2.9-1. The support of this notification is mandatory. The notification shall be triggered by the NFVO when the \" nsdOnboardingState\" attribute of a new NSD has changed to \"ONBOARDED\".\n"}},{"name":"Accept","description":"Content-Types that are acceptable for the response. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"},{"name":"Content-Type","description":"The MIME type of the body of the request. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"responses":{"204":{"description":"204 NO CONTENT\nThe notification was delivered successfully.\n","headers":{"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","maximum":1,"minimum":0},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"400":{"description":"Bad Request\nError: Invalid attribute-based filtering parameters. The response body shall contain a ProblemDetails structure, in which the \"detail\" attribute should convey more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"401":{"description":"Unauthorized If the request contains no access token even though one is required, or if the request contains an authorization token that is invalid (e.g. expired or revoked), the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW-Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750 and IETF RFC 7235. The ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"type":"string","description":"The MIME type of the body of the response."},"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n"}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"403":{"description":"Forbidden If the API consumer is not allowed to perform a particular request to a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided.  It should include in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, and may indicate how to solve it.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"404":{"description":"Not Found If the API producer did not find a current representation for the resource addressed by the URI passed in the request, or is not willing to disclose that one exists, it shall respond with this response code.  The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided, including in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, e.g. a wrong resource URI variable.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"405":{"description":"Method Not Allowed If a particular HTTP method is not supported for a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted in that case.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"406":{"description":"406 Not Acceptable\nIf the \"Accept\" header does not contain at least one name of a content type for which the NFVO can provide a representation of the NSD, the NFVO shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be included with the \"detail\" attribute providing more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"500":{"description":"Internal Server Error If there is an application error not related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"), the API producer shall respond with this response code. The ProblemDetails structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information about the source of the problem.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"503":{"description":"Service Unavailable If the API producer encounters an internal overload situation of itself or of a system it relies on, it should respond with this response code, following the provisions in IETF RFC 7231 [13] for the use of the Retry-After HTTP header and for the alternative to refuse the connection. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"get":{"summary":"Test the notification endpoint","description":"This resource represents a notification endpoint. The server can use this resource to send notifications to a subscribed client, which has provided the URI of this resource during the subscription process.\nThe GET method allows the server to test the notification endpoint that is provided by the client, e.g. during subscription. This method shall follow the provisions specified in the Table 5.4.10.3.2-2 for URI query parameters, request and response data structures, and response codes.\n","parameters":[{"name":"Accept","description":"Content-Types that are acceptable for the response. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"responses":{"204":{"description":"204 NO CONTENT\nThe notification endpoint was tested successfully. The response body shall be empty.\n","headers":{"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","maximum":1,"minimum":0},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"400":{"description":"Bad Request\nError: Invalid attribute-based filtering parameters. The response body shall contain a ProblemDetails structure, in which the \"detail\" attribute should convey more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"401":{"description":"Unauthorized If the request contains no access token even though one is required, or if the request contains an authorization token that is invalid (e.g. expired or revoked), the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW-Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750 and IETF RFC 7235. The ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"type":"string","description":"The MIME type of the body of the response."},"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n"}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"403":{"description":"Forbidden If the API consumer is not allowed to perform a particular request to a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided.  It should include in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, and may indicate how to solve it.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"404":{"description":"Not Found If the API producer did not find a current representation for the resource addressed by the URI passed in the request, or is not willing to disclose that one exists, it shall respond with this response code.  The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided, including in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, e.g. a wrong resource URI variable.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"405":{"description":"Method Not Allowed If a particular HTTP method is not supported for a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted in that case.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"406":{"description":"406 Not Acceptable\nIf the \"Accept\" header does not contain at least one name of a content type for which the NFVO can provide a representation of the NSD, the NFVO shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be included with the \"detail\" attribute providing more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"500":{"description":"Internal Server Error If there is an application error not related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"), the API producer shall respond with this response code. The ProblemDetails structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information about the source of the problem.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"503":{"description":"Service Unavailable If the API producer encounters an internal overload situation of itself or of a system it relies on, it should respond with this response code, following the provisions in IETF RFC 7231 [13] for the use of the Retry-After HTTP header and for the alternative to refuse the connection. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}}},"/URI_is_provided_by_the_client_when_creating_the_subscription-NsdOnBoardingFailureNotification":{"parameters":[{"name":"Authorization","description":"The authorization token for the request. Reference: IETF RFC 7235.\n","in":"header","required":false,"type":"string"},{"name":"Version","description":"Version of the API requested to use when responding to this request.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"post":{"summary":"Notify about NSD and PNFD changes","description":"This resource represents a notification endpoint. The server can use this resource to send notifications to a subscribed client, which has provided the URI of this resource during the subscription process.\nThe POST method delivers a notification from the server to the client. This method shall support the URI query parameters, request and response data structures, and response codes, as specified in the Table 5.4.10.3.1-2.\n","parameters":[{"name":"NsdOnBoardingFailureNotification","description":"A notification about the failure of on-boarding an NSD.\n","in":"body","required":true,"schema":{"type":"object","required":["_links","id","notificationType","subscriptionId","nsdInfoId","onboardingFailureDetails","timeStamp"],"properties":{"id":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"notificationType":{"type":"string","description":"Discriminator for the different notification types. Shall be set to \"NsdOnboardingFailureNotification\" for this notification type.\n"},"subscriptionId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"timeStamp":{"description":"Date-time stamp.  Representation: String formatted according to IETF RFC 3339.\n","type":"string","format":"date-time"},"nsdInfoId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"nsdId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"onboardingFailureDetails":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}},"_links":{"type":"object","required":["nsdInfo","subscription"],"properties":{"nsdInfo":{"description":"This type represents a link to a resource.\n","type":"object","required":["href"],"properties":{"href":{"description":"URI of the referenced resource.\n","type":"string","format":"url"}}},"subscription":{"description":"This type represents a link to a resource.\n","type":"object","required":["href"],"properties":{"href":{"description":"URI of the referenced resource.\n","type":"string","format":"url"}}}},"description":"This type represents the links to resources that an NSD management notification can contain.\n"}},"description":"This type represents an NSD management notification, which informs the receiver of the failure of on-boarding an NSD. It shall comply with the provisions defined in Table 5.5.2.10-1. The support of this notification is mandatory. The notification shall be triggered by the NFVO when the on-boarding of an NSD has failed.\n"}},{"name":"Accept","description":"Content-Types that are acceptable for the response. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"},{"name":"Content-Type","description":"The MIME type of the body of the request. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"responses":{"204":{"description":"204 NO CONTENT\nThe notification was delivered successfully.\n","headers":{"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","maximum":1,"minimum":0},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"400":{"description":"Bad Request\nError: Invalid attribute-based filtering parameters. The response body shall contain a ProblemDetails structure, in which the \"detail\" attribute should convey more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"401":{"description":"Unauthorized If the request contains no access token even though one is required, or if the request contains an authorization token that is invalid (e.g. expired or revoked), the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW-Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750 and IETF RFC 7235. The ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"type":"string","description":"The MIME type of the body of the response."},"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n"}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"403":{"description":"Forbidden If the API consumer is not allowed to perform a particular request to a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided.  It should include in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, and may indicate how to solve it.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"404":{"description":"Not Found If the API producer did not find a current representation for the resource addressed by the URI passed in the request, or is not willing to disclose that one exists, it shall respond with this response code.  The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided, including in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, e.g. a wrong resource URI variable.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"405":{"description":"Method Not Allowed If a particular HTTP method is not supported for a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted in that case.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"406":{"description":"406 Not Acceptable\nIf the \"Accept\" header does not contain at least one name of a content type for which the NFVO can provide a representation of the NSD, the NFVO shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be included with the \"detail\" attribute providing more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"500":{"description":"Internal Server Error If there is an application error not related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"), the API producer shall respond with this response code. The ProblemDetails structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information about the source of the problem.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"503":{"description":"Service Unavailable If the API producer encounters an internal overload situation of itself or of a system it relies on, it should respond with this response code, following the provisions in IETF RFC 7231 [13] for the use of the Retry-After HTTP header and for the alternative to refuse the connection. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"get":{"summary":"Test the notification endpoint","description":"This resource represents a notification endpoint. The server can use this resource to send notifications to a subscribed client, which has provided the URI of this resource during the subscription process.\nThe GET method allows the server to test the notification endpoint that is provided by the client, e.g. during subscription. This method shall follow the provisions specified in the Table 5.4.10.3.2-2 for URI query parameters, request and response data structures, and response codes.\n","parameters":[{"name":"Accept","description":"Content-Types that are acceptable for the response. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"responses":{"204":{"description":"204 NO CONTENT\nThe notification endpoint was tested successfully. The response body shall be empty.\n","headers":{"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","maximum":1,"minimum":0},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"400":{"description":"Bad Request\nError: Invalid attribute-based filtering parameters. The response body shall contain a ProblemDetails structure, in which the \"detail\" attribute should convey more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"401":{"description":"Unauthorized If the request contains no access token even though one is required, or if the request contains an authorization token that is invalid (e.g. expired or revoked), the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW-Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750 and IETF RFC 7235. The ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"type":"string","description":"The MIME type of the body of the response."},"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n"}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"403":{"description":"Forbidden If the API consumer is not allowed to perform a particular request to a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided.  It should include in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, and may indicate how to solve it.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"404":{"description":"Not Found If the API producer did not find a current representation for the resource addressed by the URI passed in the request, or is not willing to disclose that one exists, it shall respond with this response code.  The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided, including in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, e.g. a wrong resource URI variable.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"405":{"description":"Method Not Allowed If a particular HTTP method is not supported for a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted in that case.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"406":{"description":"406 Not Acceptable\nIf the \"Accept\" header does not contain at least one name of a content type for which the NFVO can provide a representation of the NSD, the NFVO shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be included with the \"detail\" attribute providing more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"500":{"description":"Internal Server Error If there is an application error not related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"), the API producer shall respond with this response code. The ProblemDetails structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information about the source of the problem.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"503":{"description":"Service Unavailable If the API producer encounters an internal overload situation of itself or of a system it relies on, it should respond with this response code, following the provisions in IETF RFC 7231 [13] for the use of the Retry-After HTTP header and for the alternative to refuse the connection. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}}},"/URI_is_provided_by_the_client_when_creating_the_subscription-NsdChangeNotification":{"parameters":[{"name":"Authorization","description":"The authorization token for the request. Reference: IETF RFC 7235.\n","in":"header","required":false,"type":"string"},{"name":"Version","description":"Version of the API requested to use when responding to this request.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"post":{"summary":"Notify about NSD and PNFD changes","description":"This resource represents a notification endpoint. The server can use this resource to send notifications to a subscribed client, which has provided the URI of this resource during the subscription process.\nThe POST method delivers a notification from the server to the client. This method shall support the URI query parameters, request and response data structures, and response codes, as specified in the Table 5.4.10.3.1-2.\n","parameters":[{"name":"NsdChangeNotification","description":"A notification about the state change of an on-boarded NSD.\n","in":"body","required":true,"schema":{"type":"object","required":["_links","id","notificationType","subscriptionId","nsdId","nsdInfoId","nsdOperationalState","timeStamp"],"properties":{"id":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"notificationType":{"type":"string","description":"Discriminator for the different notification types. Shall be set to \"NsdChangeNotification\" for this notification type.\n"},"subscriptionId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"timeStamp":{"description":"Date-time stamp.  Representation: String formatted according to IETF RFC 3339.\n","type":"string","format":"date-time"},"nsdInfoId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"nsdId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"nsdOperationalState":{"type":"string","description":"\"The enumeration NsdOperationalStateType shall comply with the provisions defined in Table 5.5.4.3-1 of GS NFV_SOL 005. It indicates the operational state of the resource. ENABLED = The operational state of the resource is enabled.  DISABLED = The operational state of the resource is disabled.\"\n","enum":["ENABLED","DISABLED"]},"_links":{"type":"object","required":["nsdInfo","subscription"],"properties":{"nsdInfo":{"description":"This type represents a link to a resource.\n","type":"object","required":["href"],"properties":{"href":{"description":"URI of the referenced resource.\n","type":"string","format":"url"}}},"subscription":{"description":"This type represents a link to a resource.\n","type":"object","required":["href"],"properties":{"href":{"description":"URI of the referenced resource.\n","type":"string","format":"url"}}}},"description":"This type represents the links to resources that an NSD management notification can contain.\n"}},"description":"This type represents an NSD management notification, which informs the receiver of a change of the \"nsdOperationalState\" attribute of an on-boarded NSD. Changes in the value of the \"nsdUsageState\" and \"nsdOnboardingState\" attributes are not reported. The notification shall comply with the provisions defined in Table 5.5.2.11-1. The support of this notification is mandatory. The notification shall be triggered by the NFVO when the value of the \"nsdOperationalState\" attribute has changed, and the \"nsdOperationalState\" attribute has the value \"ONBOARDED\".\n"}},{"name":"Accept","description":"Content-Types that are acceptable for the response. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"},{"name":"Content-Type","description":"The MIME type of the body of the request. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"responses":{"204":{"description":"204 NO CONTENT\nThe notification was delivered successfully.\n","headers":{"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","maximum":1,"minimum":0},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"400":{"description":"Bad Request\nError: Invalid attribute-based filtering parameters. The response body shall contain a ProblemDetails structure, in which the \"detail\" attribute should convey more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"401":{"description":"Unauthorized If the request contains no access token even though one is required, or if the request contains an authorization token that is invalid (e.g. expired or revoked), the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW-Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750 and IETF RFC 7235. The ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"type":"string","description":"The MIME type of the body of the response."},"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n"}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"403":{"description":"Forbidden If the API consumer is not allowed to perform a particular request to a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided.  It should include in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, and may indicate how to solve it.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"404":{"description":"Not Found If the API producer did not find a current representation for the resource addressed by the URI passed in the request, or is not willing to disclose that one exists, it shall respond with this response code.  The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided, including in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, e.g. a wrong resource URI variable.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"405":{"description":"Method Not Allowed If a particular HTTP method is not supported for a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted in that case.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"406":{"description":"406 Not Acceptable\nIf the \"Accept\" header does not contain at least one name of a content type for which the NFVO can provide a representation of the NSD, the NFVO shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be included with the \"detail\" attribute providing more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"500":{"description":"Internal Server Error If there is an application error not related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"), the API producer shall respond with this response code. The ProblemDetails structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information about the source of the problem.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"503":{"description":"Service Unavailable If the API producer encounters an internal overload situation of itself or of a system it relies on, it should respond with this response code, following the provisions in IETF RFC 7231 [13] for the use of the Retry-After HTTP header and for the alternative to refuse the connection. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"get":{"summary":"Test the notification endpoint","description":"This resource represents a notification endpoint. The server can use this resource to send notifications to a subscribed client, which has provided the URI of this resource during the subscription process.\nThe GET method allows the server to test the notification endpoint that is provided by the client, e.g. during subscription. This method shall follow the provisions specified in the Table 5.4.10.3.2-2 for URI query parameters, request and response data structures, and response codes.\n","parameters":[{"name":"Accept","description":"Content-Types that are acceptable for the response. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"responses":{"204":{"description":"204 NO CONTENT\nThe notification endpoint was tested successfully. The response body shall be empty.\n","headers":{"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","maximum":1,"minimum":0},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"400":{"description":"Bad Request\nError: Invalid attribute-based filtering parameters. The response body shall contain a ProblemDetails structure, in which the \"detail\" attribute should convey more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"401":{"description":"Unauthorized If the request contains no access token even though one is required, or if the request contains an authorization token that is invalid (e.g. expired or revoked), the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW-Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750 and IETF RFC 7235. The ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"type":"string","description":"The MIME type of the body of the response."},"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n"}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"403":{"description":"Forbidden If the API consumer is not allowed to perform a particular request to a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided.  It should include in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, and may indicate how to solve it.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"404":{"description":"Not Found If the API producer did not find a current representation for the resource addressed by the URI passed in the request, or is not willing to disclose that one exists, it shall respond with this response code.  The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided, including in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, e.g. a wrong resource URI variable.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"405":{"description":"Method Not Allowed If a particular HTTP method is not supported for a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted in that case.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"406":{"description":"406 Not Acceptable\nIf the \"Accept\" header does not contain at least one name of a content type for which the NFVO can provide a representation of the NSD, the NFVO shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be included with the \"detail\" attribute providing more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"500":{"description":"Internal Server Error If there is an application error not related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"), the API producer shall respond with this response code. The ProblemDetails structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information about the source of the problem.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"503":{"description":"Service Unavailable If the API producer encounters an internal overload situation of itself or of a system it relies on, it should respond with this response code, following the provisions in IETF RFC 7231 [13] for the use of the Retry-After HTTP header and for the alternative to refuse the connection. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}}},"/URI_is_provided_by_the_client_when_creating_the_subscription-NsdDeletionNotification":{"parameters":[{"name":"Authorization","description":"The authorization token for the request. Reference: IETF RFC 7235.\n","in":"header","required":false,"type":"string"},{"name":"Version","description":"Version of the API requested to use when responding to this request.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"post":{"summary":"Notify about NSD and PNFD changes","description":"This resource represents a notification endpoint. The server can use this resource to send notifications to a subscribed client, which has provided the URI of this resource during the subscription process.\nThe POST method delivers a notification from the server to the client. This method shall support the URI query parameters, request and response data structures, and response codes, as specified in the Table 5.4.10.3.1-2.\n","parameters":[{"name":"NsdDeletionNotification","description":"A notification about the deletion of an on-boarded NSD.\n","in":"body","required":true,"schema":{"type":"object","required":["_links","id","notificationType","subscriptionId","nsdId","nsdInfoId","timeStamp"],"properties":{"id":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"notificationType":{"type":"string","description":"Discriminator for the different notification types. Shall be set to \"NsdDeletionNotification \" for this notification type.\n"},"subscriptionId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"timeStamp":{"description":"Date-time stamp.  Representation: String formatted according to IETF RFC 3339.\n","type":"string","format":"date-time"},"nsdInfoId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"nsdId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"_links":{"type":"object","required":["nsdInfo","subscription"],"properties":{"nsdInfo":{"description":"This type represents a link to a resource.\n","type":"object","required":["href"],"properties":{"href":{"description":"URI of the referenced resource.\n","type":"string","format":"url"}}},"subscription":{"description":"This type represents a link to a resource.\n","type":"object","required":["href"],"properties":{"href":{"description":"URI of the referenced resource.\n","type":"string","format":"url"}}}},"description":"This type represents the links to resources that an NSD management notification can contain.\n"}},"description":"This type represents an NSD management notification, which informs the receiver of the deletion of an on-boarded NSD. The notification shall comply with the provisions defined in Table 5.5.2.12-1. The support of this notification is mandatory. The notification shall be triggered by the NFVO when it has deleted an on-boarded NSD.\n"}},{"name":"Accept","description":"Content-Types that are acceptable for the response. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"},{"name":"Content-Type","description":"The MIME type of the body of the request. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"responses":{"204":{"description":"204 NO CONTENT\nThe notification was delivered successfully.\n","headers":{"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","maximum":1,"minimum":0},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"400":{"description":"Bad Request\nError: Invalid attribute-based filtering parameters. The response body shall contain a ProblemDetails structure, in which the \"detail\" attribute should convey more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"401":{"description":"Unauthorized If the request contains no access token even though one is required, or if the request contains an authorization token that is invalid (e.g. expired or revoked), the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW-Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750 and IETF RFC 7235. The ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"type":"string","description":"The MIME type of the body of the response."},"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n"}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"403":{"description":"Forbidden If the API consumer is not allowed to perform a particular request to a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided.  It should include in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, and may indicate how to solve it.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"404":{"description":"Not Found If the API producer did not find a current representation for the resource addressed by the URI passed in the request, or is not willing to disclose that one exists, it shall respond with this response code.  The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided, including in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, e.g. a wrong resource URI variable.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"405":{"description":"Method Not Allowed If a particular HTTP method is not supported for a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted in that case.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"406":{"description":"406 Not Acceptable\nIf the \"Accept\" header does not contain at least one name of a content type for which the NFVO can provide a representation of the NSD, the NFVO shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be included with the \"detail\" attribute providing more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"500":{"description":"Internal Server Error If there is an application error not related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"), the API producer shall respond with this response code. The ProblemDetails structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information about the source of the problem.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"503":{"description":"Service Unavailable If the API producer encounters an internal overload situation of itself or of a system it relies on, it should respond with this response code, following the provisions in IETF RFC 7231 [13] for the use of the Retry-After HTTP header and for the alternative to refuse the connection. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"get":{"summary":"Test the notification endpoint","description":"This resource represents a notification endpoint. The server can use this resource to send notifications to a subscribed client, which has provided the URI of this resource during the subscription process.\nThe GET method allows the server to test the notification endpoint that is provided by the client, e.g. during subscription. This method shall follow the provisions specified in the Table 5.4.10.3.2-2 for URI query parameters, request and response data structures, and response codes.\n","parameters":[{"name":"Accept","description":"Content-Types that are acceptable for the response. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"responses":{"204":{"description":"204 NO CONTENT\nThe notification endpoint was tested successfully. The response body shall be empty.\n","headers":{"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","maximum":1,"minimum":0},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"400":{"description":"Bad Request\nError: Invalid attribute-based filtering parameters. The response body shall contain a ProblemDetails structure, in which the \"detail\" attribute should convey more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"401":{"description":"Unauthorized If the request contains no access token even though one is required, or if the request contains an authorization token that is invalid (e.g. expired or revoked), the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW-Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750 and IETF RFC 7235. The ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"type":"string","description":"The MIME type of the body of the response."},"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n"}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"403":{"description":"Forbidden If the API consumer is not allowed to perform a particular request to a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided.  It should include in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, and may indicate how to solve it.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"404":{"description":"Not Found If the API producer did not find a current representation for the resource addressed by the URI passed in the request, or is not willing to disclose that one exists, it shall respond with this response code.  The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided, including in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, e.g. a wrong resource URI variable.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"405":{"description":"Method Not Allowed If a particular HTTP method is not supported for a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted in that case.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"406":{"description":"406 Not Acceptable\nIf the \"Accept\" header does not contain at least one name of a content type for which the NFVO can provide a representation of the NSD, the NFVO shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be included with the \"detail\" attribute providing more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"500":{"description":"Internal Server Error If there is an application error not related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"), the API producer shall respond with this response code. The ProblemDetails structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information about the source of the problem.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"503":{"description":"Service Unavailable If the API producer encounters an internal overload situation of itself or of a system it relies on, it should respond with this response code, following the provisions in IETF RFC 7231 [13] for the use of the Retry-After HTTP header and for the alternative to refuse the connection. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}}},"/URI_is_provided_by_the_client_when_creating_the_subscription-PnfdOnBoardingNotification":{"parameters":[{"name":"Authorization","description":"The authorization token for the request. Reference: IETF RFC 7235.\n","in":"header","required":false,"type":"string"},{"name":"Version","description":"Version of the API requested to use when responding to this request.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"post":{"summary":"Notify about NSD and PNFD changes","description":"This resource represents a notification endpoint. The server can use this resource to send notifications to a subscribed client, which has provided the URI of this resource during the subscription process.\nThe POST method delivers a notification from the server to the client. This method shall support the URI query parameters, request and response data structures, and response codes, as specified in the Table 5.4.10.3.1-2.\n","parameters":[{"name":"PnfdOnBoardingNotification","description":"A notification about the successful on-boarding of a PNFD.\n","in":"body","required":true,"schema":{"type":"object","required":["_links","id","notificationType","subscriptionId","pnfdId","pnfdInfoId","timeStamp"],"properties":{"id":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"notificationType":{"type":"string","description":"Discriminator for the different notification types. Shall be set to \"PnfdOnboardingNotification\" for this notification type.\n"},"subscriptionId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"timeStamp":{"description":"Date-time stamp.  Representation: String formatted according to IETF RFC 3339.\n","type":"string","format":"date-time"},"pnfdInfoId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"pnfdId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"_links":{"type":"object","required":["pnfdInfo","subscription"],"properties":{"pnfdInfo":{"description":"This type represents a link to a resource.\n","type":"object","required":["href"],"properties":{"href":{"description":"URI of the referenced resource.\n","type":"string","format":"url"}}},"subscription":{"description":"This type represents a link to a resource.\n","type":"object","required":["href"],"properties":{"href":{"description":"URI of the referenced resource.\n","type":"string","format":"url"}}}},"description":"This type represents the links to resources that a PNFD management notification can contain.\n"}},"description":"This type represents a PNFD management notification, which informs the receiver of the successful on-boarding of aPNFD. It shall comply with the provisions defined in Table 5.5.2.13-1. The support of this notification is mandatory. The notification is triggered when a new PNFD is on-boarded.\n"}},{"name":"Accept","description":"Content-Types that are acceptable for the response. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"},{"name":"Content-Type","description":"The MIME type of the body of the request. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"responses":{"204":{"description":"204 No Content\nThe notification was delivered successfully.\n","headers":{"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","maximum":1,"minimum":0},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"400":{"description":"Bad Request\nError: Invalid attribute-based filtering parameters. The response body shall contain a ProblemDetails structure, in which the \"detail\" attribute should convey more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"401":{"description":"Unauthorized If the request contains no access token even though one is required, or if the request contains an authorization token that is invalid (e.g. expired or revoked), the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW-Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750 and IETF RFC 7235. The ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"type":"string","description":"The MIME type of the body of the response."},"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n"}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"403":{"description":"Forbidden If the API consumer is not allowed to perform a particular request to a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided.  It should include in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, and may indicate how to solve it.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"404":{"description":"Not Found If the API producer did not find a current representation for the resource addressed by the URI passed in the request, or is not willing to disclose that one exists, it shall respond with this response code.  The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided, including in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, e.g. a wrong resource URI variable.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"405":{"description":"Method Not Allowed If a particular HTTP method is not supported for a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted in that case.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"406":{"description":"406 Not Acceptable\nIf the \"Accept\" header does not contain at least one name of a content type for which the NFVO can provide a representation of the NSD, the NFVO shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be included with the \"detail\" attribute providing more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"500":{"description":"Internal Server Error If there is an application error not related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"), the API producer shall respond with this response code. The ProblemDetails structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information about the source of the problem.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"503":{"description":"Service Unavailable If the API producer encounters an internal overload situation of itself or of a system it relies on, it should respond with this response code, following the provisions in IETF RFC 7231 [13] for the use of the Retry-After HTTP header and for the alternative to refuse the connection. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"get":{"summary":"Test the notification endpoint","description":"This resource represents a notification endpoint. The server can use this resource to send notifications to a subscribed client, which has provided the URI of this resource during the subscription process.\nThe GET method allows the server to test the notification endpoint that is provided by the client, e.g. during subscription. This method shall follow the provisions specified in the Table 5.4.10.3.2-2 for URI query parameters, request and response data structures, and response codes.\n","parameters":[{"name":"Accept","description":"Content-Types that are acceptable for the response. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"responses":{"204":{"description":"204 NO CONTENT\nThe notification endpoint was tested successfully. The response body shall be empty.\n","headers":{"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","maximum":1,"minimum":0},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"400":{"description":"Bad Request\nError: Invalid attribute-based filtering parameters. The response body shall contain a ProblemDetails structure, in which the \"detail\" attribute should convey more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"401":{"description":"Unauthorized If the request contains no access token even though one is required, or if the request contains an authorization token that is invalid (e.g. expired or revoked), the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW-Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750 and IETF RFC 7235. The ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"type":"string","description":"The MIME type of the body of the response."},"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n"}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"403":{"description":"Forbidden If the API consumer is not allowed to perform a particular request to a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided.  It should include in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, and may indicate how to solve it.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"404":{"description":"Not Found If the API producer did not find a current representation for the resource addressed by the URI passed in the request, or is not willing to disclose that one exists, it shall respond with this response code.  The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided, including in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, e.g. a wrong resource URI variable.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"405":{"description":"Method Not Allowed If a particular HTTP method is not supported for a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted in that case.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"406":{"description":"406 Not Acceptable\nIf the \"Accept\" header does not contain at least one name of a content type for which the NFVO can provide a representation of the NSD, the NFVO shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be included with the \"detail\" attribute providing more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"500":{"description":"Internal Server Error If there is an application error not related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"), the API producer shall respond with this response code. The ProblemDetails structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information about the source of the problem.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"503":{"description":"Service Unavailable If the API producer encounters an internal overload situation of itself or of a system it relies on, it should respond with this response code, following the provisions in IETF RFC 7231 [13] for the use of the Retry-After HTTP header and for the alternative to refuse the connection. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}}},"/URI_is_provided_by_the_client_when_creating_the_subscription-PnfdOnBoardingFailureNotification":{"parameters":[{"name":"Authorization","description":"The authorization token for the request. Reference: IETF RFC 7235.\n","in":"header","required":false,"type":"string"},{"name":"Version","description":"Version of the API requested to use when responding to this request.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"post":{"summary":"Notify about NSD and PNFD changes","description":"This resource represents a notification endpoint. The server can use this resource to send notifications to a subscribed client, which has provided the URI of this resource during the subscription process.\nThe POST method delivers a notification from the server to the client. This method shall support the URI query parameters, request and response data structures, and response codes, as specified in the Table 5.4.10.3.1-2.\n","parameters":[{"name":"PnfdOnBoardingFailureNotification","description":"A notification about the failure of on-boarding a PNFD.\n","in":"body","required":true,"schema":{"type":"object","required":["_links","id","notificationType","subscriptionId","onboardingFailureDetails","pnfdInfoId","timeStamp"],"properties":{"id":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"notificationType":{"type":"string","description":"Discriminator for the different notification types. Shall be set to \"PnfdOnboardingFailureNotification\" for this notification type.\n"},"subscriptionId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"timeStamp":{"description":"Date-time stamp.  Representation: String formatted according to IETF RFC 3339.\n","type":"string","format":"date-time"},"pnfdInfoId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"pnfdId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"onboardingFailureDetails":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}},"_links":{"type":"object","required":["pnfdInfo","subscription"],"properties":{"pnfdInfo":{"description":"This type represents a link to a resource.\n","type":"object","required":["href"],"properties":{"href":{"description":"URI of the referenced resource.\n","type":"string","format":"url"}}},"subscription":{"description":"This type represents a link to a resource.\n","type":"object","required":["href"],"properties":{"href":{"description":"URI of the referenced resource.\n","type":"string","format":"url"}}}},"description":"This type represents the links to resources that a PNFD management notification can contain.\n"}},"description":"This type represents a PNFD management notification, which informs the receiver of the failure of on-boarding a PNFD. It shall comply with the provisions defined in Table 5.5.2.14-1. The support of this notification is mandatory. The notification is triggered when the on-boarding of a PNFD fails.\n"}},{"name":"Accept","description":"Content-Types that are acceptable for the response. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"},{"name":"Content-Type","description":"The MIME type of the body of the request. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"responses":{"204":{"description":"204 NO CONTENT\nThe notification was delivered successfully.\n","headers":{"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","maximum":1,"minimum":0},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"400":{"description":"Bad Request\nError: Invalid attribute-based filtering parameters. The response body shall contain a ProblemDetails structure, in which the \"detail\" attribute should convey more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"401":{"description":"Unauthorized If the request contains no access token even though one is required, or if the request contains an authorization token that is invalid (e.g. expired or revoked), the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW-Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750 and IETF RFC 7235. The ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"type":"string","description":"The MIME type of the body of the response."},"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n"}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"403":{"description":"Forbidden If the API consumer is not allowed to perform a particular request to a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided.  It should include in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, and may indicate how to solve it.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"404":{"description":"Not Found If the API producer did not find a current representation for the resource addressed by the URI passed in the request, or is not willing to disclose that one exists, it shall respond with this response code.  The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided, including in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, e.g. a wrong resource URI variable.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"405":{"description":"Method Not Allowed If a particular HTTP method is not supported for a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted in that case.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"406":{"description":"406 Not Acceptable\nIf the \"Accept\" header does not contain at least one name of a content type for which the NFVO can provide a representation of the NSD, the NFVO shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be included with the \"detail\" attribute providing more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"500":{"description":"Internal Server Error If there is an application error not related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"), the API producer shall respond with this response code. The ProblemDetails structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information about the source of the problem.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"503":{"description":"Service Unavailable If the API producer encounters an internal overload situation of itself or of a system it relies on, it should respond with this response code, following the provisions in IETF RFC 7231 [13] for the use of the Retry-After HTTP header and for the alternative to refuse the connection. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"get":{"summary":"Test the notification endpoint","description":"This resource represents a notification endpoint. The server can use this resource to send notifications to a subscribed client, which has provided the URI of this resource during the subscription process.\nThe GET method allows the server to test the notification endpoint that is provided by the client, e.g. during subscription. This method shall follow the provisions specified in the Table 5.4.10.3.2-2 for URI query parameters, request and response data structures, and response codes.\n","parameters":[{"name":"Accept","description":"Content-Types that are acceptable for the response. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"responses":{"204":{"description":"204 NO CONTENT\nThe notification endpoint was tested successfully. The response body shall be empty.\n","headers":{"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","maximum":1,"minimum":0},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"400":{"description":"Bad Request\nError: Invalid attribute-based filtering parameters. The response body shall contain a ProblemDetails structure, in which the \"detail\" attribute should convey more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"401":{"description":"Unauthorized If the request contains no access token even though one is required, or if the request contains an authorization token that is invalid (e.g. expired or revoked), the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW-Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750 and IETF RFC 7235. The ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"type":"string","description":"The MIME type of the body of the response."},"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n"}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"403":{"description":"Forbidden If the API consumer is not allowed to perform a particular request to a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided.  It should include in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, and may indicate how to solve it.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"404":{"description":"Not Found If the API producer did not find a current representation for the resource addressed by the URI passed in the request, or is not willing to disclose that one exists, it shall respond with this response code.  The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided, including in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, e.g. a wrong resource URI variable.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"405":{"description":"Method Not Allowed If a particular HTTP method is not supported for a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted in that case.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"406":{"description":"406 Not Acceptable\nIf the \"Accept\" header does not contain at least one name of a content type for which the NFVO can provide a representation of the NSD, the NFVO shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be included with the \"detail\" attribute providing more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"500":{"description":"Internal Server Error If there is an application error not related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"), the API producer shall respond with this response code. The ProblemDetails structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information about the source of the problem.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"503":{"description":"Service Unavailable If the API producer encounters an internal overload situation of itself or of a system it relies on, it should respond with this response code, following the provisions in IETF RFC 7231 [13] for the use of the Retry-After HTTP header and for the alternative to refuse the connection. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}}},"/URI_is_provided_by_the_client_when_creating_the_subscription-PnfdDeletionNotification":{"parameters":[{"name":"Authorization","description":"The authorization token for the request. Reference: IETF RFC 7235.\n","in":"header","required":false,"type":"string"},{"name":"Version","description":"Version of the API requested to use when responding to this request.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"post":{"summary":"Notify about NSD and PNFD changes","description":"This resource represents a notification endpoint. The server can use this resource to send notifications to a subscribed client, which has provided the URI of this resource during the subscription process.\nThe POST method delivers a notification from the server to the client. This method shall support the URI query parameters, request and response data structures, and response codes, as specified in the Table 5.4.10.3.1-2.\n","parameters":[{"name":"PnfdDeletionNotification","description":"A notification about the deletion of an on-boarded PNFD.\n","in":"body","required":true,"schema":{"type":"object","required":["_links","id","notificationType","subscriptionId","pnfdId","pnfdInfoId","timeStamp"],"properties":{"id":{"type":"string","description":"Identifier of this notification. If a notification is sent multiple times due to multiple subscriptions, the \"id\" attribute of all these notifications shall have the same value.\n"},"notificationType":{"type":"string","description":"Discriminator for the different notification types. Shall be set to \"PnfdDeletionNotification \" for this notification type.\n"},"subscriptionId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"timeStamp":{"description":"Date-time stamp.  Representation: String formatted according to IETF RFC 3339.\n","type":"string","format":"date-time"},"pnfdInfoId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"pnfdId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"_links":{"type":"object","required":["pnfdInfo","subscription"],"properties":{"pnfdInfo":{"description":"This type represents a link to a resource.\n","type":"object","required":["href"],"properties":{"href":{"description":"URI of the referenced resource.\n","type":"string","format":"url"}}},"subscription":{"description":"This type represents a link to a resource.\n","type":"object","required":["href"],"properties":{"href":{"description":"URI of the referenced resource.\n","type":"string","format":"url"}}}},"description":"This type represents the links to resources that a PNFD management notification can contain.\n"}},"description":"This type represents a PNFD management notification, which informs the receiver of the deletion of an on-boarded PNFD. The notification shall comply with the provisions defined in Table 5.5.2.15-1. The support of this notification is mandatory. The notification is triggered when an on-boarded PNFD is deleted.\n"}},{"name":"Accept","description":"Content-Types that are acceptable for the response. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"},{"name":"Content-Type","description":"The MIME type of the body of the request. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"responses":{"204":{"description":"204 No Content\nThe notification was delivered successfully.\n","headers":{"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","maximum":1,"minimum":0},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"400":{"description":"Bad Request\nError: Invalid attribute-based filtering parameters. The response body shall contain a ProblemDetails structure, in which the \"detail\" attribute should convey more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"401":{"description":"Unauthorized If the request contains no access token even though one is required, or if the request contains an authorization token that is invalid (e.g. expired or revoked), the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW-Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750 and IETF RFC 7235. The ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"type":"string","description":"The MIME type of the body of the response."},"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n"}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"403":{"description":"Forbidden If the API consumer is not allowed to perform a particular request to a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided.  It should include in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, and may indicate how to solve it.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"404":{"description":"Not Found If the API producer did not find a current representation for the resource addressed by the URI passed in the request, or is not willing to disclose that one exists, it shall respond with this response code.  The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided, including in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, e.g. a wrong resource URI variable.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"405":{"description":"Method Not Allowed If a particular HTTP method is not supported for a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted in that case.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"406":{"description":"406 Not Acceptable\nIf the \"Accept\" header does not contain at least one name of a content type for which the NFVO can provide a representation of the NSD, the NFVO shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be included with the \"detail\" attribute providing more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"500":{"description":"Internal Server Error If there is an application error not related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"), the API producer shall respond with this response code. The ProblemDetails structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information about the source of the problem.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"503":{"description":"Service Unavailable If the API producer encounters an internal overload situation of itself or of a system it relies on, it should respond with this response code, following the provisions in IETF RFC 7231 [13] for the use of the Retry-After HTTP header and for the alternative to refuse the connection. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"get":{"summary":"Test the notification endpoint","description":"This resource represents a notification endpoint. The server can use this resource to send notifications to a subscribed client, which has provided the URI of this resource during the subscription process.\nThe GET method allows the server to test the notification endpoint that is provided by the client, e.g. during subscription. This method shall follow the provisions specified in the Table 5.4.10.3.2-2 for URI query parameters, request and response data structures, and response codes.\n","parameters":[{"name":"Accept","description":"Content-Types that are acceptable for the response. Reference: IETF RFC 7231.\n","in":"header","required":true,"type":"string"}],"responses":{"204":{"description":"204 NO CONTENT\nThe notification endpoint was tested successfully. The response body shall be empty.\n","headers":{"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","maximum":1,"minimum":0},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"400":{"description":"Bad Request\nError: Invalid attribute-based filtering parameters. The response body shall contain a ProblemDetails structure, in which the \"detail\" attribute should convey more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"401":{"description":"Unauthorized If the request contains no access token even though one is required, or if the request contains an authorization token that is invalid (e.g. expired or revoked), the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW-Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750 and IETF RFC 7235. The ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"type":"string","description":"The MIME type of the body of the response."},"WWW-Authenticate":{"type":"string","description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n"}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"403":{"description":"Forbidden If the API consumer is not allowed to perform a particular request to a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided.  It should include in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, and may indicate how to solve it.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"404":{"description":"Not Found If the API producer did not find a current representation for the resource addressed by the URI passed in the request, or is not willing to disclose that one exists, it shall respond with this response code.  The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided, including in the \"detail\" attribute information about the source of the problem, e.g. a wrong resource URI variable.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"405":{"description":"Method Not Allowed If a particular HTTP method is not supported for a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted in that case.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"406":{"description":"406 Not Acceptable\nIf the \"Accept\" header does not contain at least one name of a content type for which the NFVO can provide a representation of the NSD, the NFVO shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be included with the \"detail\" attribute providing more information about the error.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"500":{"description":"Internal Server Error If there is an application error not related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"), the API producer shall respond with this response code. The ProblemDetails structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information about the source of the problem.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}},"503":{"description":"Service Unavailable If the API producer encounters an internal overload situation of itself or of a system it relies on, it should respond with this response code, following the provisions in IETF RFC 7231 [13] for the use of the Retry-After HTTP header and for the alternative to refuse the connection. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be omitted.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 [19] is reproduced in this structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807 [19], the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 [19] foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807 [19].\n","type":"object","required":["statussss","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 [5] that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}}}}}