{"openapi":"3.0.2","info":{"title":"SOL003 - VNF Performance Management Notification interface","description":"SOL003 - VNF Performance Management Notification interface\n\nIMPORTANT: Please note that this file might be not aligned to the current\nversion of the ETSI Group Specification it refers to. In case of\ndiscrepancies the published ETSI Group Specification takes precedence.\n\nPlease report bugs to https://forge.etsi.org/rep/nfv/SOL002-SOL003/issues\n","contact":{"name":"NFV-SOL WG"},"license":{"name":"ETSI Forge copyright notice","url":"https://forge.etsi.org/etsi-forge-copyright-notice.txt"},"version":"2.2.0-impl:etsi.org:ETSI_NFV_OpenAPI:1"},"externalDocs":{"description":"ETSI GS NFV-SOL 003 V3.7.1","url":"https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_gs/NFV-SOL/001_099/003/03.07.01_60/gs_NFV-SOL003v030701p.pdf"},"servers":[{"url":"http://127.0.0.1/callback/v2"},{"url":"https://127.0.0.1/callback/v2"}],"paths":{"/URI_is_provided_by_the_client_when_creating_the_subscription-PerformanceInformationAvailableNotification":{"parameters":[{"name":"Authorization","description":"The authorization token for the request. Reference: IETF RFC 7235.\n","in":"header","required":false,"schema":{"type":"string"}},{"name":"Version","description":"Version of the API requested to use when responding to this request.\n","in":"header","required":true,"schema":{"type":"string"}}],"post":{"description":"The POST method delivers a notification regarding a performance management event from API producer to an\nAPI consumer. The API consumer shall have previously created an \"Individual PM job\" resource\nor \"Individual threshold\" resource. See clause 6.4.9.3.1.\n","parameters":[{"name":"Content-Type","description":"The MIME type of the body of the request. Reference: IETF RFC 7231\n","in":"header","required":true,"schema":{"type":"string"}}],"requestBody":{"$ref":"#/components/requestBodies/PerformanceInformationAvailableNotification"},"responses":{"204":{"$ref":""},"400":{"description":"400 BAD REQUEST\n400 code can be returned in the following specified cases, the specific cause has to be proper specified in the \"ProblemDetails\" structure to be returned.\nIf the request is malformed or syntactically incorrect (e.g. if the request URI contains incorrect query parameters or the message content contains a syntactically incorrect data structure), the API producer shall respond with this response code. More details are defined in IETF RFC 9110. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided, and should include in the \"detail\" attribute more  information about the source of the problem.\nIf the response to a GET request which queries a container resource would be so big that the performance of the API producer is adversely affected, and the API producer does not support paging for the affected resource, it shall respond with this response code. Clause 5.4.2.2 specifies provisions for the \"ProblemDetails\" structure  provided in the response body.\nIf there is an application error related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"), the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information about the source of the problem.\nIf the request contains a malformed access token, the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750. The  ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\nThe use of this HTTP error response code described above is applicable to the use of the OAuth 2.0 for the authorization of API requests and notifications, as defined in clauses 8.3.3 and 8.3.4.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"401":{"description":"401 UNAUTHORIZED\nIf the request contains no access token even though one is required, or if the request contains an authorization token that is invalid (e.g. expired or revoked), the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW-Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750 and IETF RFC 9110. The ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"403":{"description":"403 FORBIDDEN\nIf the API consumer is not allowed to perform a particular request to a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. More details are defined in IETF RFC 9110. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided. It should include in the \"detail\" attribute information  about the source of the problem, and may indicate how to solve it.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"405":{"description":"405 METHOD NOT ALLOWED\nIf a particular HTTP method is not supported for a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"406":{"description":"406 NOT ACCEPTABLE\nIf the \"Accept\" HTTP header does not contain at least one name of a content type that is acceptable to the API producer, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"500":{"description":"500 INTERNAL SERVER ERROR\nIf the Server is unable to process the request, and retrying the same request later might eventually  succeed, the server shall respond with this response code. Further, if there is an application error  not related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"),  the API producer shall respond with this response code. More details are defined in IETF RFC 9110. The  \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information  about the source of the problem.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"503":{"description":"503 SERVICE UNAVAILABLE\nIf the API producer encounters an internal overload situation of itself or of a system it relies on, it should respond with this response code, following the provisions in IETF RFC 9110 for the use of the \"Retry-After\" HTTP header and for the alternative to refuse the connection. The \"ProblemDetails\"  structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}}}},"get":{"description":"The GET method allows the API producer to test the notification endpoint that is provided by the API consumer,\ne.g. during creation of the PM job or threshold resource. See clause 6.4.9.3.2.\n","responses":{"204":{"$ref":""},"400":{"description":"400 BAD REQUEST\n400 code can be returned in the following specified cases, the specific cause has to be proper specified in the \"ProblemDetails\" structure to be returned.\nIf the request is malformed or syntactically incorrect (e.g. if the request URI contains incorrect query parameters or the message content contains a syntactically incorrect data structure), the API producer shall respond with this response code. More details are defined in IETF RFC 9110. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided, and should include in the \"detail\" attribute more  information about the source of the problem.\nIf the response to a GET request which queries a container resource would be so big that the performance of the API producer is adversely affected, and the API producer does not support paging for the affected resource, it shall respond with this response code. Clause 5.4.2.2 specifies provisions for the \"ProblemDetails\" structure  provided in the response body.\nIf there is an application error related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"), the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information about the source of the problem.\nIf the request contains a malformed access token, the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750. The  ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\nThe use of this HTTP error response code described above is applicable to the use of the OAuth 2.0 for the authorization of API requests and notifications, as defined in clauses 8.3.3 and 8.3.4.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"401":{"description":"401 UNAUTHORIZED\nIf the request contains no access token even though one is required, or if the request contains an authorization token that is invalid (e.g. expired or revoked), the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW-Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750 and IETF RFC 9110. The ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"403":{"description":"403 FORBIDDEN\nIf the API consumer is not allowed to perform a particular request to a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. More details are defined in IETF RFC 9110. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided. It should include in the \"detail\" attribute information  about the source of the problem, and may indicate how to solve it.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"405":{"description":"405 METHOD NOT ALLOWED\nIf a particular HTTP method is not supported for a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"406":{"description":"406 NOT ACCEPTABLE\nIf the \"Accept\" HTTP header does not contain at least one name of a content type that is acceptable to the API producer, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"500":{"description":"500 INTERNAL SERVER ERROR\nIf the Server is unable to process the request, and retrying the same request later might eventually  succeed, the server shall respond with this response code. Further, if there is an application error  not related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"),  the API producer shall respond with this response code. More details are defined in IETF RFC 9110. The  \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information  about the source of the problem.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"503":{"description":"503 SERVICE UNAVAILABLE\nIf the API producer encounters an internal overload situation of itself or of a system it relies on, it should respond with this response code, following the provisions in IETF RFC 9110 for the use of the \"Retry-After\" HTTP header and for the alternative to refuse the connection. The \"ProblemDetails\"  structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}}}}},"/URI_is_provided_by_the_client_when_creating_the_subscription-ThresholdCrossedNotification":{"parameters":[{"name":"Authorization","description":"The authorization token for the request. Reference: IETF RFC 7235.\n","in":"header","required":false,"schema":{"type":"string"}},{"name":"Version","description":"Version of the API requested to use when responding to this request.\n","in":"header","required":true,"schema":{"type":"string"}}],"post":{"description":"The POST method delivers a notification regarding a performance management event from API producer to an\nAPI consumer. The API consumer shall have previously created an \"Individual PM job\" resource\nor \"Individual threshold\" resource. See clause 6.4.9.3.1.\n","parameters":[{"name":"Content-Type","description":"The MIME type of the body of the request. Reference: IETF RFC 7231\n","in":"header","required":true,"schema":{"type":"string"}}],"requestBody":{"$ref":"#/components/requestBodies/ThresholdCrossedNotification"},"responses":{"204":{"$ref":"#/components/responses/ThresholdCrossedNotification.Post.204"},"400":{"description":"400 BAD REQUEST\n400 code can be returned in the following specified cases, the specific cause has to be proper specified in the \"ProblemDetails\" structure to be returned.\nIf the request is malformed or syntactically incorrect (e.g. if the request URI contains incorrect query parameters or the message content contains a syntactically incorrect data structure), the API producer shall respond with this response code. More details are defined in IETF RFC 9110. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided, and should include in the \"detail\" attribute more  information about the source of the problem.\nIf the response to a GET request which queries a container resource would be so big that the performance of the API producer is adversely affected, and the API producer does not support paging for the affected resource, it shall respond with this response code. Clause 5.4.2.2 specifies provisions for the \"ProblemDetails\" structure  provided in the response body.\nIf there is an application error related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"), the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information about the source of the problem.\nIf the request contains a malformed access token, the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750. The  ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\nThe use of this HTTP error response code described above is applicable to the use of the OAuth 2.0 for the authorization of API requests and notifications, as defined in clauses 8.3.3 and 8.3.4.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"401":{"description":"401 UNAUTHORIZED\nIf the request contains no access token even though one is required, or if the request contains an authorization token that is invalid (e.g. expired or revoked), the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW-Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750 and IETF RFC 9110. The ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"403":{"description":"403 FORBIDDEN\nIf the API consumer is not allowed to perform a particular request to a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. More details are defined in IETF RFC 9110. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided. It should include in the \"detail\" attribute information  about the source of the problem, and may indicate how to solve it.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"405":{"description":"405 METHOD NOT ALLOWED\nIf a particular HTTP method is not supported for a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"406":{"description":"406 NOT ACCEPTABLE\nIf the \"Accept\" HTTP header does not contain at least one name of a content type that is acceptable to the API producer, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"500":{"description":"500 INTERNAL SERVER ERROR\nIf the Server is unable to process the request, and retrying the same request later might eventually  succeed, the server shall respond with this response code. Further, if there is an application error  not related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"),  the API producer shall respond with this response code. More details are defined in IETF RFC 9110. The  \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information  about the source of the problem.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"503":{"description":"503 SERVICE UNAVAILABLE\nIf the API producer encounters an internal overload situation of itself or of a system it relies on, it should respond with this response code, following the provisions in IETF RFC 9110 for the use of the \"Retry-After\" HTTP header and for the alternative to refuse the connection. The \"ProblemDetails\"  structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}}}},"get":{"description":"The GET method allows the API producer to test the notification endpoint that is provided by the API consumer,\ne.g. during creation of the PM job or threshold resource. See clause 6.4.9.3.2.\n","responses":{"204":{"$ref":"#/components/responses/ThresholdCrossedNotification.Get.204"},"400":{"description":"400 BAD REQUEST\n400 code can be returned in the following specified cases, the specific cause has to be proper specified in the \"ProblemDetails\" structure to be returned.\nIf the request is malformed or syntactically incorrect (e.g. if the request URI contains incorrect query parameters or the message content contains a syntactically incorrect data structure), the API producer shall respond with this response code. More details are defined in IETF RFC 9110. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided, and should include in the \"detail\" attribute more  information about the source of the problem.\nIf the response to a GET request which queries a container resource would be so big that the performance of the API producer is adversely affected, and the API producer does not support paging for the affected resource, it shall respond with this response code. Clause 5.4.2.2 specifies provisions for the \"ProblemDetails\" structure  provided in the response body.\nIf there is an application error related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"), the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information about the source of the problem.\nIf the request contains a malformed access token, the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750. The  ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\nThe use of this HTTP error response code described above is applicable to the use of the OAuth 2.0 for the authorization of API requests and notifications, as defined in clauses 8.3.3 and 8.3.4.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"401":{"description":"401 UNAUTHORIZED\nIf the request contains no access token even though one is required, or if the request contains an authorization token that is invalid (e.g. expired or revoked), the API producer should respond with this response. The details of the error shall be returned in the WWW-Authenticate HTTP header, as defined in IETF RFC 6750 and IETF RFC 9110. The ProblemDetails structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"403":{"description":"403 FORBIDDEN\nIf the API consumer is not allowed to perform a particular request to a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. More details are defined in IETF RFC 9110. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided. It should include in the \"detail\" attribute information  about the source of the problem, and may indicate how to solve it.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"405":{"description":"405 METHOD NOT ALLOWED\nIf a particular HTTP method is not supported for a particular resource, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"406":{"description":"406 NOT ACCEPTABLE\nIf the \"Accept\" HTTP header does not contain at least one name of a content type that is acceptable to the API producer, the API producer shall respond with this response code. The \"ProblemDetails\" structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"500":{"description":"500 INTERNAL SERVER ERROR\nIf the Server is unable to process the request, and retrying the same request later might eventually  succeed, the server shall respond with this response code. Further, if there is an application error  not related to the client's input that cannot be easily mapped to any other HTTP response code (\"catch all error\"),  the API producer shall respond with this response code. More details are defined in IETF RFC 9110. The  \"ProblemDetails\" structure shall be provided, and shall include in the \"detail\" attribute more information  about the source of the problem.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}},"503":{"description":"503 SERVICE UNAVAILABLE\nIf the API producer encounters an internal overload situation of itself or of a system it relies on, it should respond with this response code, following the provisions in IETF RFC 9110 for the use of the \"Retry-After\" HTTP header and for the alternative to refuse the connection. The \"ProblemDetails\"  structure may be provided.\n","headers":{"Content-Type":{"description":"The MIME type of the body of the response.","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}},"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the corresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":0}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","schema":{"type":"string","maximum":1,"minimum":1}}},"content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"The definition of the general \"ProblemDetails\" data structure from IETF RFC 7807 is reproduced inthis structure. Compared to the general framework defined in IETF RFC 7807, the \"status\" and \"detail\" attributes are mandated to be included by the present document, to ensure that the response contains additional textual information about an error. IETF RFC 7807 foresees extensibility of the \"ProblemDetails\" type. It is possible that particular APIs in the present document, or particular implementations, define extensions to define additional attributes that provide more information about the error. The description column only provides some explanation of the meaning to Facilitate understanding of the design. For a full description, see IETF RFC 7807.\n","type":"object","required":["status","detail"],"properties":{"type":{"description":"A URI reference according to IETF RFC 3986 that identifies the problem type. It is encouraged that the URI provides human-readable documentation for the problem (e.g. using HTML) when dereferenced. When this member is not present, its value is assumed to be \"about:blank\".\n","type":"string","format":"URI"},"title":{"description":"A short, human-readable summary of the problem type. It should not change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization. If type is given and other than \"about:blank\", this attribute shall also be provided. A short, human-readable summary of the problem type.  It SHOULD NOT change from occurrence to occurrence of the problem, except for purposes of localization (e.g., using proactive content negotiation; see [RFC7231], Section 3.4).\n","type":"string"},"status":{"description":"The HTTP status code for this occurrence of the problem. The HTTP status code ([RFC7231], Section 6) generated by the origin server for this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"integer"},"detail":{"description":"A human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence of the problem.\n","type":"string"},"instance":{"description":"A URI reference that identifies the specific occurrence of the problem. It may yield further information if dereferenced.\n","type":"string","format":"URI"}}}}}}}}}},"components":{"requestBodies":{"PerformanceInformationAvailableNotification":{"description":"Notification about performance information availability.\n","content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"This notification informs the receiver that performance information is available. The notification shall be triggered by the VNFM when new performance information collected by a PM job is available. The periodicity of triggering this notification is influenced by the  \"reportingPeriod\" attribute in the \"PmJobCriteria\" data structure.\n","type":"object","required":["id","notificationType","timeStamp","pmJobId","objectType","objectInstanceId","_links"],"properties":{"id":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"notificationType":{"description":"Discriminator for the different notification types. Shall be set to \"PerformanceInformationAvailableNotification\" for this notification type.\n","type":"string","enum":["PerformanceInformationAvailableNotification"]},"timeStamp":{"description":"Date-time stamp. Representation: String formatted according to IETF RFC 3339.\n","type":"string","format":"date-time"},"pmJobId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"objectType":{"description":"Type of the measured object. The applicable measured object type for a measurement is defined in clause 7.2 of ETSI GS NFV-IFA 027.\n","type":"string"},"objectInstanceId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"subObjectInstanceIds":{"description":"Identifiers of the sub-object instances of the measured object instance for which the measurements have been taken. Shall be present if the related PM job has been set up to measure only a subset of all sub-object instances of the measured object instance and a sub-object is defined in clause 6.2 of ETSI GS NFV-IFA 027 for the related measured object type. Shall be absent otherwise.\n","type":"array","items":{"description":"An identifier that is unique for the respective type within a VNF instance, but may not be globally unique.\n","type":"string"}},"_links":{"description":"Links to resources related to this notification.\n","type":"object","required":["pmJob","performanceReport"],"properties":{"objectInstance":{"description":"This type represents a link to a resource in a notification, using an absolute or relative URI.\n","type":"object","required":["href"],"properties":{"href":{"description":"String formatted according to IETF RFC 3986.\n","type":"string"}}},"pmJob":{"description":"This type represents a link to a resource in a notification, using an absolute or relative URI.\n","type":"object","required":["href"],"properties":{"href":{"description":"String formatted according to IETF RFC 3986.\n","type":"string"}}},"performanceReport":{"description":"This type represents a link to a resource in a notification, using an absolute or relative URI.\n","type":"object","required":["href"],"properties":{"href":{"description":"String formatted according to IETF RFC 3986.\n","type":"string"}}}}}}}}},"required":true},"ThresholdCrossedNotification":{"description":"Notification about performance information availability.\n","content":{"application/json":{"schema":{"description":"This type represents a notification that is sent when a threshold has been crossed.\nNOTE:\tThe timing of sending this notification is determined by the capability of the \n      producing entity to evaluate the threshold crossing condition.\n      \nThe notification shall be triggered by the VNFM when a threshold has been crossed.\nNOTE:\tThe sub-object allows to structure the measured object, but is not to be confused \n      with sub-counters which allow to structure the measurement.\n","type":"object","required":["id","notificationType","timeStamp","thresholdId","crossingDirection","objectType","objectInstanceId","performanceMetric","performanceValue","_links"],"properties":{"id":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"notificationType":{"description":"Discriminator for the different notification types. Shall be set to \"ThresholdCrossedNotification\" for this notification type.\n","type":"string","enum":["ThresholdCrossedNotification"]},"timeStamp":{"description":"Date-time stamp. Representation: String formatted according to IETF RFC 3339.\n","type":"string","format":"date-time"},"thresholdId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"crossingDirection":{"type":"string","enum":["UP","DOWN"]},"objectType":{"description":"Type of the measured object. The applicable measured object type for a measurement is defined in clause 7.2 of ETSI GS NFV-IFA 027.\n","type":"string"},"objectInstanceId":{"description":"An identifier with the intention of being globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"subObjectInstanceId":{"description":"An identifier that is unique for the respective type within a VNF instance, but may not be globally unique.\n","type":"string"},"performanceMetric":{"description":"Performance metric associated with the threshold. This attribute shall contain the related \"Measurement Name\" value as defined in clause 7.2 of ETSI GS NFV-IFA 027.\n","type":"string"},"performanceValue":{"description":"Value of the metric that resulted in threshold crossing. The type of this attribute shall correspond to the related \"Measurement Unit\" as defined in clause 7.2 of ETSI GS NFV-IFA 027.\n","type":"object"},"context":{"description":"This type represents a list of key-value pairs. The order of the pairs in the list is not significant. In JSON, a set of keyvalue pairs is represented as an object. It shall comply with the provisions defined in clause 4 of IETF RFC 8259. In the following example, a list of key-value pairs with four keys (\"aString\", \"aNumber\", \"anArray\" and \"anObject\") is provided to illustrate that the values associated with different keys can be of different type.\n","type":"object"},"_links":{"description":"Links to resources related to this notification.\n","type":"object","required":["threshold"],"properties":{"objectInstance":{"description":"This type represents a link to a resource in a notification, using an absolute or relative URI.\n","type":"object","required":["href"],"properties":{"href":{"description":"String formatted according to IETF RFC 3986.\n","type":"string"}}},"threshold":{"description":"This type represents a link to a resource in a notification, using an absolute or relative URI.\n","type":"object","required":["href"],"properties":{"href":{"description":"String formatted according to IETF RFC 3986.\n","type":"string"}}}}}}}}},"required":true}},"responses":{"PerformanceInformationAvailableNotification.Post.204":{"description":"204 NO CONTENT\n\nShall be returned when the notification has been delivered successfully.\n","headers":{"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the\ncorresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","style":"simple","explode":false,"schema":{"type":"string"}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","style":"simple","explode":false,"schema":{"type":"string"}}}},"PerformanceInformationAvailableNotification.Get.204":{"description":"204 NO CONTENT\n\nShall be returned to indicate that the notification endpoint has been tested successfully.\nThe response body shall be empty.\n","headers":{"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the\ncorresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","style":"simple","explode":false,"schema":{"type":"string"}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","style":"simple","explode":false,"schema":{"type":"string"}}}},"ThresholdCrossedNotification.Post.204":{"description":"204 NO CONTENT\n\nShall be returned when the notification has been delivered successfully.\n","headers":{"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the\ncorresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","style":"simple","explode":false,"schema":{"type":"string"}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","style":"simple","explode":false,"schema":{"type":"string"}}}},"ThresholdCrossedNotification.Get.204":{"description":"204 NO CONTENT\n\nShall be returned to indicate that the notification endpoint has been tested successfully.\nThe response body shall be empty.\n","headers":{"WWW-Authenticate":{"description":"Challenge if the corresponding HTTP request has not provided authorization, or error details if the\ncorresponding HTTP request has provided an invalid authorization token.\n","style":"simple","explode":false,"schema":{"type":"string"}},"Version":{"description":"Version of the API used in the response.\n","style":"simple","explode":false,"schema":{"type":"string"}}}}}}}