ETSI's Bug Tracker |
Anonymous | Login | Signup for local Mantis account | 30-04-2024 13:41 IST |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Monitor project |
View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||||||
0008175 | 3GPP SA5 Bug Tracking | [NFV Specifications] Feature Gap | public | 16-09-2022 08:38 | 15-12-2022 09:18 | ||||||||
Reporter | Sujeet Banerjee | ||||||||||||
Assigned To | |||||||||||||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried | ||||||||
Status | new | Resolution | open | ||||||||||
Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||||||
Product Version | |||||||||||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||||||||||
Summary | 0008175: [V4.3.1] [Claim 6.8.13.2] Property 'mcio_constraint_params' in Vdu.OsContainerDeployableUnit is irrelevant and CONFLICTING | ||||||||||||
Description | The valid values for 'mcio_constraint_params' as given below are irrlevant: - affinity_nfvi_pop - affinity_zone - affinity_zone_group - affinity_nfvi_node - affinity_cis_node - anti_affinity_nfvi_pop - anti_affinity_zone - anti_affinity_zone_group - anti_affinity_nfvi_node - anti_affinity_cis_node - local_affinity_nfvi_pop - local_affinity_zone - local_affinity_zoneGroup - local_affinity_nfvi_node - local_affinity_cis_node - local_anti_affinity_nfvi_pop - local_anti_affinity_zone - local_anti_affinity_zone_group - local_anti_affinity_nfvi_node - local_anti_affinity_cis_node That is because, the placement constraints can be specified CORRECTLY using the policies: "AffinityRule" / "AntiaffinityRule" (Clause 6.10.10) The property 'mcio_constraint_params' may be CONFLICTING because, it does not specify, say in case of affinity GROUPS (e.g. affinity_cis_node), how more than one SETs of VDUs can be placed into more than one groupings. | ||||||||||||
Additional Information | These allowed values of 'mcio_constraint_params' are irrelevant as well: - node_additional_capability_ssd - node_additional_capability_dpdk - node_additional_capability_sriov - node_additional_capability_gpu - node_additional_capability_fpga - node_additional_capability_cpu_pin - node_capability_logical_numa - node_pool That's because, these are NOT contraints. They are indeed requirements for additional capabilities, and can be specified using other properties of Vdu.OsContainerDeployableUnit, eg. "requested_additional_capabilities" and/or "logical_node" (clause 6.8.13.2) | ||||||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||||||
TS/TR Rapporteur | |||||||||||||
Source (company - Author) | |||||||||||||
TS number | |||||||||||||
TS version | |||||||||||||
Clause Reference(s) | |||||||||||||
Attached Files | |||||||||||||
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
15-12-2022 09:18 | Sujeet Banerjee | New Issue | |
15-12-2022 09:18 | Sujeet Banerjee | Issue generated from: 0008133 |
MantisBT 1.2.14 [^] Copyright © 2000 - 2024 MantisBT Team |