Logo etsi

ETSI's Bug Tracker

Notice: information submitted on the ETSI issue Tracker may be incorporated in ETSI publication(s) and therefore subject to the ETSI IPR policy.

View Issue Details Jump to Notes ] Issue History ] Print ]
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0007314SECURITYTSS&TPpublic14-01-2016 10:2821-01-2016 16:53
Reporterhaddads 
Assigned ToDenis Filatov 
PrioritynormalSeverityminorReproducibilityhave not tried
StatusresolvedResolutionno change required 
PlatformOSOS Version
Product Version 
Target VersionNext VersionFixed in Version 
Summary0007314: [TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04_01_BO and 04_04 and 04_06] Formulation harmonization
DescriptionSince each header_fields must appear at most once why not use the
"same type" of test as TP_SEC_ITSS_SND_CERT_AA_08_01_BV :

ensure that {
  when {
    the IUT is receiving a SecuredMessage (DENM)
      containing header_fields[0..N]
       containing not unique items}
then {
    the IUT discards a SecuredMessage
  }
}

and thus avoid to repeat the same test for each field, which does not
test if the same header_fields is not included somewhere else than
just after or before the other instance of the type.


An other formula is also used in TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_GENMSG_10_02_BO :

"containing 2 instances of type"
TagsNo tags attached.
Attached Files

- Relationships

-  Notes
(0013756)
Denis Filatov (administrator)
21-01-2016 16:53

As headers types must be is ascending order it is enough to test that type[n] is greater then type[n-1]. It will avoid any duplications.

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
14-01-2016 10:28 haddads New Issue
14-01-2016 10:28 haddads Status new => assigned
14-01-2016 10:28 haddads Assigned To => Denis Filatov
21-01-2016 16:53 Denis Filatov Note Added: 0013756
21-01-2016 16:53 Denis Filatov Status assigned => resolved
21-01-2016 16:53 Denis Filatov Resolution open => no change required


MantisBT 1.2.14 [^]
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 MantisBT Team
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker