ETSI's Bug Tracker |
Anonymous | Login | Signup for local Mantis account | 21-05-2024 07:26 IST |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Stop monitoring project |
View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
0006925 | GeoNetworking | PICS | public | 09-03-2015 11:13 | 04-05-2015 11:35 | ||||
Reporter | Thomas Reschka | ||||||||
Assigned To | user67 | ||||||||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always | ||||
Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||||||
Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||
Product Version | |||||||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||||||
Summary | 0006925: Values allowed vs. default/initial value | ||||||||
Description | Dear all, In table A.32 of ETSI TS 102 871-1 the last column is labled with "Value allowed". This column contains the value "1" for the PICS item 26 (itsGnGeoUnicastCbfMinTime). Certain tests (e.g. TP/GEONW/PON/BCA/BV/01) required a value of "300" or higher for this parameter. The headline of the last column should consequently be changed from "Values allowed" to "Default/initial value" OR the given value "1" should be replaced by the allowed range, e.g. "1-1000". The same applies for the parameters 26-29 and others. I am also wondering why those parameters are defined as PICS parameters and not as PIXIT parameters. Please let me know your understanding. Thanks and best regards, Thomas | ||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
Attached Files | |||||||||
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
09-03-2015 11:13 | Thomas Reschka | New Issue | |
27-04-2015 13:39 | Sebastian Muellers | Assigned To | => user67 |
27-04-2015 13:39 | Sebastian Muellers | Status | new => assigned |
04-05-2015 11:35 | Sebastian Muellers | Status | assigned => resolved |
04-05-2015 11:35 | Sebastian Muellers | Resolution | open => fixed |
MantisBT 1.2.14 [^] Copyright © 2000 - 2024 MantisBT Team |