ETSI's Bug Tracker |
Anonymous | Login | Signup for local Mantis account | 17-05-2024 17:28 IST |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Monitor project |
View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||||||
0005574 | 3GPP SA5 Bug Tracking | Quality | public | 22-06-2010 16:59 | 18-02-2011 08:59 | ||||||||
Reporter | user601 | ||||||||||||
Assigned To | Clemens Suerbaum | ||||||||||||
Priority | normal | Severity | major | Reproducibility | N/A | ||||||||
Status | assigned | Resolution | open | ||||||||||
Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||||||
Product Version | |||||||||||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||||||||||
Summary | 0005574: Issues with 32.122 | ||||||||||||
Description | References: 32.150 is so useful it gets added twice ;-) as ref 1 and ref 5. "[4] 3GPP TS 32.121: "Telecommunication management; Advanced Alarm Management Reference Point (IRP): Requirements"." does not match the spec title at http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/TSG-WG--S5.htm [^] References 8&9 are not used in the spec. Definitions: There is a strange mix of fonts here.. "IRP: See 3GPP TS 32.150 [1]. IRPAgent: See 3GPP TS 32.150 [1]." There is a strange definition AAMRule, I'm not sure if it's a good idea or not. If we agree that it's a good idea, then there is a mix of AAMRule and AAM Rule throughout the document, I'm not sure if there is a significance given that it resolves to the same thing anyway, and is later used as "An AAMRule (called Rule hereafter).." "AAM Advanced Alarm Management AAMRule Advanced Alarm Management Rule" 5.1 Imported IOCs. Top and IRPAgent are not used. "managedGenericIRP" should be "ManagedGenericIRP" in both columns of the table. I would consider 5.3.1.1.1 as a step too far in chapter headings, and does not comply with the IS template. I don't think the extra level adds any clarity anyway? "5.3.1.1 Definition 5.3.1.1.1 General Definition" Small typo in "An AAM Rule instance is fully identified by its DNdistinguished name" 6.2.1 Small typo in "This interface defines methods for the IRPManagerIRPManager to request for alarm notifications of significant information (significant from the IRPManager’s perspective)." 6.2.2 Again we appear to have an extra level of heading, for no obvious reason, and not according to the template I think "6.2.2.1 Definition This operation allows an IRPManager to activate an AAM rule (see §A.3.1.1.2.1). 6.2.2.2 Input parameters 6.2.2.2.1 Generic Input parameters" Annex A does not read very well, and there are specific ambiguities in A.1, for example: "The first element (subSection titled: Criterion to determine alike alarm) is a criterion..." which does not specific a specific Clause number. There are three clauses with that name: "A.2.1.2 Criterion to determine alike alarm A.2.2.2 Criterion to determine alike alarm A.2.3.2 Criterion to determine alike alarm" There are several of these vague references "The second element (subSection titled: Treatment of alike alarm)", "The third element (subSection titled: Relation to Log and AlarmList)", etc. | ||||||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||||||
TS/TR Rapporteur | |||||||||||||
Source (company - Author) | Ericsson - John Power | ||||||||||||
TS number | 32.122 | ||||||||||||
TS version | 8.1.0/9.0.0 | ||||||||||||
Clause Reference(s) | Several clauses throughout the spec | ||||||||||||
Attached Files | |||||||||||||
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
22-06-2010 16:59 | user601 | New Issue | |
22-06-2010 16:59 | user601 | Source (company - Author) | => Ericsson - John Power |
22-06-2010 16:59 | user601 | TS number | => 32.122 |
22-06-2010 16:59 | user601 | TS version | => 8.1.0/9.0.0 |
22-06-2010 16:59 | user601 | Clause Reference(s) | => Several clauses throughout the spec |
18-02-2011 08:59 | Christian Toche | Status | new => assigned |
18-02-2011 08:59 | Christian Toche | Assigned To | => Clemens Suerbaum |
MantisBT 1.2.14 [^] Copyright © 2000 - 2024 MantisBT Team |