ETSI's Bug Tracker |
Anonymous | Login | Signup for local Mantis account | 24-04-2024 09:17 IST |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | Monitor project |
View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
0007302 | SECURITY | TSS&TP | public | 14-01-2016 09:36 | 13-12-2016 16:03 | ||||
Reporter | haddads | ||||||||
Assigned To | Denis Filatov | ||||||||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried | ||||
Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | ||||||
Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||
Product Version | |||||||||
Target Version | Next Version | Fixed in Version | |||||||
Summary | 0007302: [TP_SEC_ITSS_SND_CERT_06_02_BV] Typos | ||||||||
Description | A { is missing after the second id_region. And an extra brake line has been introduced after CERTIFICATES[n-1]. And again I can't find in the 103 096 1&2&3 v1.2.1 any specification of CERTIFICATES (its not in ETSI TS 103 096-3 V1.2.1 section 5.3, not define any where in the version I have of 103 096-3 V1.2.1). So why the certificate should all contain a validity region ? I don't understand ? Why N and not a precise value if we know what should be expected in the chain ? | ||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
Attached Files | |||||||||
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
14-01-2016 09:36 | haddads | New Issue | |
14-01-2016 09:36 | haddads | Status | new => assigned |
14-01-2016 09:36 | haddads | Assigned To | => Denis Filatov |
14-01-2016 21:03 | Denis Filatov | Note Added: 0013690 | |
13-12-2016 13:28 | Denis Filatov | Note Added: 0014410 | |
13-12-2016 13:28 | Denis Filatov | Status | assigned => resolved |
13-12-2016 13:28 | Denis Filatov | Resolution | open => fixed |
13-12-2016 16:03 | Denis Filatov | Checkin | |
13-12-2016 16:03 | Denis Filatov | Note Added: 0014425 |
MantisBT 1.2.14 [^] Copyright © 2000 - 2024 MantisBT Team |