ETSI's Bug Tracker - Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language
View Issue Details
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0007602Part 01: TTCN-3 Core LanguageClarificationpublic03-02-2017 10:4830-12-2017 17:31
ReporterTomas Urban 
Assigned ToGyorgy Rethy 
PrioritylowSeverityminorReproducibilityhave not tried
StatusclosedResolutionfixed 
PlatformOSOS Version
Product Versionv4.9.1 (published 2017-05) 
Target Versionv4.10.1 (published 2018-05)Fixed in Versionv4.10.1 (published 2018-05) 
Clause Reference(s)22.3.1
Source (company - Author)STF 521
Summary0007602: Three options of handling blocking multicast and broadcast calls
DescriptionThe description of handling multicast and broadcast blocking calls claims that: "In case of a multicast or broadcast call operation of a blocking procedure, two options exist." It also provides a description of these two options. However, that's not completely true, because there's a third option: the call can be executed with the nowait parameter in which case all responses are handled in the subsequent alt or interleave block.
Steps To Reproduce
Additional Information
TagsNo tags attached.
Relationships
Attached Filesdocx CR-7602-170727.docx (70,249) 27-07-2017 14:36
http://oldforge.etsi.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=3666&type=bug
docx CR-7602-170727-v2.docx (91,888) 27-07-2017 15:35
http://oldforge.etsi.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=3667&type=bug
docx CR-7602-170727-v3.docx (71,995) 04-09-2017 12:37
http://oldforge.etsi.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=3676&type=bug
Issue History
Date ModifiedUsernameFieldChange
03-02-2017 10:48Tomas UrbanNew Issue
24-04-2017 16:10szabadosNote Added: 0014603
24-04-2017 16:22szabadosNote Added: 0014604
06-06-2017 12:00Jens GrabowskiAssigned To => Jens Grabowski
06-06-2017 12:00Jens GrabowskiStatusnew => assigned
27-07-2017 14:36Jens GrabowskiFile Added: CR-7602-170727.docx
27-07-2017 14:38Jens GrabowskiNote Added: 0014787
27-07-2017 14:39Jens GrabowskiAssigned ToJens Grabowski => Tomas Urban
27-07-2017 14:39Jens GrabowskiStatusassigned => confirmed
27-07-2017 15:35Tomas UrbanFile Added: CR-7602-170727-v2.docx
27-07-2017 15:36Tomas UrbanNote Added: 0014788
27-07-2017 15:36Tomas UrbanAssigned ToTomas Urban => Jens Grabowski
27-07-2017 15:43Jens GrabowskiNote Added: 0014790
27-07-2017 15:44Jens GrabowskiAssigned ToJens Grabowski => Kristóf Szabados
27-07-2017 15:44Jens GrabowskiStatusconfirmed => assigned
27-07-2017 15:44Jens GrabowskiStatusassigned => confirmed
04-09-2017 12:37Kristóf SzabadosFile Added: CR-7602-170727-v3.docx
04-09-2017 12:39Kristóf SzabadosNote Added: 0014808
04-09-2017 12:39Kristóf SzabadosAssigned ToKristóf Szabados => Jens Grabowski
04-09-2017 12:39Kristóf SzabadosStatusconfirmed => assigned
04-09-2017 12:40Kristóf SzabadosNote Added: 0014809
04-09-2017 12:40Kristóf SzabadosStatusassigned => confirmed
04-09-2017 12:43Jens GrabowskiNote Added: 0014811
04-09-2017 12:43Jens GrabowskiStatusconfirmed => resolved
04-09-2017 12:43Jens GrabowskiResolutionopen => fixed
04-09-2017 12:43Jens GrabowskiAssigned ToJens Grabowski => Gyorgy Rethy
30-12-2017 17:31Gyorgy RethyNote Added: 0014959
30-12-2017 17:31Gyorgy RethyStatusresolved => closed
30-12-2017 17:31Gyorgy RethyFixed in Version => v4.10.1 (published 2018-05)
30-12-2017 17:31Gyorgy RethyTarget Version => v4.10.1 (published 2018-05)

Notes
(0014603)
szabados   
24-04-2017 16:10   
I'm also wondering if repeat is really the only option to handle the responses or exceptions in the response or exception handling part.(2nd option)
(0014604)
szabados   
24-04-2017 16:22   
Also what is example 6 trying to do here?
If I understand correctly it will only accept the first reply (from one of 2 components) ... there is no point using repeat if the guards have no chance to be fulfilled the second time around.

Also if the guard is fulfilled by a variable the example checks if the variable is true ... the if -s don't seem to have a function?
(0014787)
Jens Grabowski   
27-07-2017 14:38   
I changed the description of the possibilities, changed the example 6 and also added the keyword "nowait" to the syntax description.

Tomas, please check.
(0014788)
Tomas Urban   
27-07-2017 15:36   
It is fine by me, I only made several formatting changes in the added text and slightly modified the example. Please check.
(0014790)
Jens Grabowski   
27-07-2017 15:43   
Fine for me, Kristof: If also ok for you, please resolve and assign to György.
(0014808)
Kristóf Szabados   
04-09-2017 12:39   
I simplified a bit example 6 and tried to give it a reasonably good description (to see what the example is trying to show).
Please check.

Otherwise it looks ok for me and can be resolved.
(0014809)
Kristóf Szabados   
04-09-2017 12:40   
please check the simplification of example 6, and resolve if ok.
(0014811)
Jens Grabowski   
04-09-2017 12:43   
Ready for implementation.
(0014959)
Gyorgy Rethy   
30-12-2017 17:31   
Added to draft V4.9.2