ETSI's Bug Tracker - SECURITY
View Issue Details
0007379SECURITYTSS&TPpublic04-02-2016 13:5705-02-2016 14:06
Peter Felber 
Peter Felber 
normalminorhave not tried
assignedopen 
Test_Spec_TS103096_V121 
Test_Spec_TS103096_V121 
0007379: Check presence of Headerfield encryption_parameter in CAM
For chapter 5.3.2.3:

Summary: Check that IUT discards a secured CAM containing a headerfield of type encryption_parameter.
Reference: ETSI TS 103 097 [1], clause 7.1
PICS Selection: PICS_GN_SECURITY

with {
  the IUT being in the 'authorized' state
}
ensure that {
  when {
    the IUT is receiving a SecuredMessage (CAM)
      containing header_fields[0].type
        indicating 'signer_info'
      and containing header_fields[1].type
        indicating 'generation_time'
      and containing header_fields[2] {
        containing type
          indicating 'its_aid'
        containing its_aid
          indicating 'AID_CAM'
      }
      and containing header_fields[3] {
        containing type 'encryption_parameter'
  } then {
    the IUT discards a SecuredMessage
  }
}
No tags attached.
Issue History
04-02-2016 13:57Peter FelberNew Issue
04-02-2016 13:57Peter FelberStatusnew => assigned
04-02-2016 13:57Peter FelberAssigned To => Denis Filatov
05-02-2016 12:53Denis FilatovNote Added: 0013806
05-02-2016 12:54Denis FilatovNote Added: 0013807
05-02-2016 12:54Denis FilatovAssigned ToDenis Filatov => Peter Felber
05-02-2016 12:54Denis FilatovStatusassigned => new
05-02-2016 12:54Denis FilatovStatusnew => assigned
05-02-2016 12:57Denis FilatovNote Added: 0013808
05-02-2016 14:06Denis FilatovCheckin
05-02-2016 14:06Denis FilatovNote Added: 0013812

Notes
(0013806)
Denis Filatov   
05-02-2016 12:53   
I think it is necessary to provide valid enc_params to be sure that message has been rejected because of presence of the header field but not by the invalid parameters.
Peter, could you please provide ones?
(0013807)
Denis Filatov   
05-02-2016 12:54   
I think it is necessary to provide valid enc_params to be sure that message has been rejected because of presence of the header field but not by the invalid parameters.
Peter, could you please provide ones?
(0013808)
Denis Filatov   
05-02-2016 12:57   
It is required also for DENM and for recipient_info.
(0013812)
Denis Filatov   
05-02-2016 14:06   
info 0007379
3 variants for each type of messages
A /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04_13_BO.json [^]
A /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04_13_BO.json [^]
U /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_GENMSG/SEC_ITSS_RCV_GENMSG_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_GENMSG_04_13_BV.json [^]