ETSI's Bug Tracker - SECURITY
View Issue Details
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0007350SECURITYTSS&TPpublic14-01-2016 13:3721-01-2016 17:01
Reporterhaddads 
Assigned ToDenis Filatov 
PrioritynormalSeverityminorReproducibilityhave not tried
StatusresolvedResolutionfixed 
PlatformOSOS Version
Product Version 
Target VersionFixed in Version 
Summary0007350: [TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04_08_BO] - generation_time vs generation_time_with_standard_deviation
DescriptionThe generation_time is within the validity period of the signer
certificate and generation_time_with_standard_deviation is not. Since
the second one is the one that should be ignored, should'nt the
expected behavior of the IUT be to accept the message insteed of
discarding it ?
Steps To Reproduce
Additional Information
TagsNo tags attached.
Relationships
Attached Files
Issue History
Date ModifiedUsernameFieldChange
14-01-2016 13:37haddadsNew Issue
14-01-2016 13:37haddadsStatusnew => assigned
14-01-2016 13:37haddadsAssigned To => Denis Filatov
19-01-2016 17:16Denis FilatovNote Added: 0013730
19-01-2016 17:16Denis FilatovStatusassigned => feedback
19-01-2016 17:44Denis FilatovSummary[TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04_08_BO] => [TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04_08_BO] - generation_time vs generation_time_with_standard_deviation
20-01-2016 14:58Sebastian MuellersNote Added: 0013740
20-01-2016 14:59Sebastian MuellersNote Added: 0013741
20-01-2016 14:59Sebastian MuellersStatusfeedback => assigned
21-01-2016 11:38Denis FilatovCheckin
21-01-2016 11:38Denis FilatovNote Added: 0013753
21-01-2016 11:38Denis FilatovStatusassigned => resolved
21-01-2016 11:38Denis FilatovResolutionopen => fixed
21-01-2016 17:01Denis FilatovCheckin
21-01-2016 17:01Denis FilatovNote Added: 0013760

Notes
(0013730)
Denis Filatov   
19-01-2016 17:16   
To be discussed on the meeting
I think it is actually should be discarded because:
1. generation_time_with_standard_deviation is not allowed
2. there are two time-related headers. Which is a good one - who knows...
(0013740)
Sebastian Muellers   
20-01-2016 14:58   
Discussion with Peter confirmed the view that messge shall eb discarded because of pressence of generation_time_with_standard_deviation. This conclusionisn basedon the sentence in base spec section 7.1 "None of the possible HeaderField cases shall be included more than once. All other HeaderField types defined in clause 5 shall not be used"
(0013741)
Sebastian Muellers   
20-01-2016 14:59   
make clesar in TP that msg is discarded because of presence of generation_time_with_standard_deviation
(0013753)
Denis Filatov   
21-01-2016 11:38   
fix 0007358 0007350
note 0007361
Messages should be discarded because of the presence of unneeded header fields
D /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04_08_BO [^]
U /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04_08_BO.json [^]
D /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04_09_BO.json [^]
D /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04_10_BO [^]
U /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04_10_BO.json [^]
D /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04_11_BO [^]
U /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04_11_BO.json [^]
(0013760)
Denis Filatov   
21-01-2016 17:01   
Header fields issues are fixed for DENM
notes 0007316 0007349 0007358 0007350 0007360
fix 0007317 0007349
U /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04_01_BO.json [^]
U /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04_02_BO.json [^]
U /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04_03_BO.json [^]
U /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04_04_BO.json [^]
U /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04_05_BO.json [^]
U /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04_06_BO.json [^]
U /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04_07_BO.json [^]
U /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04_08_BO.json [^]
U /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04_09_BO.json [^]
U /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04_10_BO.json [^]
D /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04_11_BO.json [^]
A /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04_11_BO.json [^]
D /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_RCV/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM/SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04/TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_DENM_04_12_BV.json [^]