ETSI's Bug Tracker - SECURITY
View Issue Details
0007347SECURITYTSS&TPpublic14-01-2016 13:3119-01-2016 17:12
haddads 
Denis Filatov 
normalminorhave not tried
resolvedfixed 
 
Next Version 
0007347: [TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04_01_BO] Other formulation
Other possible formulation ?

containing header_fields[x].type and header_fields[y].type (x different from y)
  indicating 'signer_info'

Idem for TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04_04_BO
and TP_SEC_ITSS_RCV_CAM_04_06_BO.
No tags attached.
Issue History
14-01-2016 13:31haddadsNew Issue
14-01-2016 13:31haddadsStatusnew => assigned
14-01-2016 13:31haddadsAssigned To => Denis Filatov
19-01-2016 17:12Denis FilatovNote Added: 0013729
19-01-2016 17:12Denis FilatovStatusassigned => resolved
19-01-2016 17:12Denis FilatovResolutionopen => fixed

Notes
(0013729)
Denis Filatov   
19-01-2016 17:12   
we can not because we have to send a message where all fields are defined.