ETSI's Bug Tracker - SECURITY
View Issue Details
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0007333SECURITYTSS&TPpublic14-01-2016 13:0715-01-2016 16:40
Reporterhaddads 
Assigned ToDenis Filatov 
PrioritynormalSeverityminorReproducibilityhave not tried
StatusresolvedResolutionfixed 
PlatformOSOS Version
Product Version 
Target VersionNext VersionFixed in Version 
Summary0007333: [TP_SEC_ITSS_SND_CAM_02_01_BV] Typo and formulation harmonization for "header fields in the ascending order" tests
DescriptionTypo : an extra space for "header_fields [n]"

Shouldn't we indicate some how that the value of n is greater than 0 ?

e.g. : containing header_fields[0]
        containing type
          indicating 'signer_info'
      and containing header_fields[n].type (n>0)

The first containing header_fields[0] already impose that ?

Or use the same formulation as for example TP_SEC_ITSS_SND_GENMSG_02_01_BV :

containing header_fields [0].type
        indicating 'signer_info'
      containing header_fields [1..n]
        where header_fields [i].type < header_fields [i+1].type
Steps To Reproduce
Additional Information
TagsNo tags attached.
Relationships
Attached Files
Issue History
Date ModifiedUsernameFieldChange
14-01-2016 13:07haddadsNew Issue
14-01-2016 13:07haddadsStatusnew => assigned
14-01-2016 13:07haddadsAssigned To => Denis Filatov
15-01-2016 16:40Denis FilatovCheckin
15-01-2016 16:40Denis FilatovNote Added: 0013702
15-01-2016 16:40Denis FilatovStatusassigned => resolved
15-01-2016 16:40Denis FilatovResolutionopen => fixed

Notes
(0013702)
Denis Filatov   
15-01-2016 16:40   
fix 0007333
U /branches/STF507/requality/TS103096/root/Requirements/SEC_ITSS/SEC_ITSS_SND/SEC_ITSS_SND_CAM/SEC_ITSS_SND_CAM_02/TP_SEC_ITSS_SND_CAM_02_01_BV.json [^]