ETSI's Bug Tracker - SECURITY
View Issue Details
0007301SECURITYTSS&TPpublic14-01-2016 09:1913-12-2016 13:17
haddads 
Denis Filatov 
normalminorhave not tried
resolvedfixed 
Test_Spec_TS103096_V121 
Next Version 
0007301: [TP_SEC_ITSS_SND_CERT_05_02_BV] Is CERTIFICATES defined somewhere ?
I could'nt find a specification for CERTIFICATS.

Shouldn't we also specify what is the expected result if the
certificate CERTIFICATES [N-1] doesn't exist or doesn't contain a
validity region, or states that its a the prerequisite in the "with"
part.
No tags attached.
Issue History
14-01-2016 09:19haddadsNew Issue
14-01-2016 09:19haddadsStatusnew => assigned
14-01-2016 09:19haddadsAssigned To => Denis Filatov
14-01-2016 09:59Peter FelberNote Added: 0013685
15-01-2016 13:45Denis FilatovNote Added: 0013695
15-01-2016 13:48Denis FilatovNote Added: 0013696
13-12-2016 13:17Denis FilatovNote Added: 0014409
13-12-2016 13:17Denis FilatovStatusassigned => resolved
13-12-2016 13:17Denis FilatovResolutionopen => fixed

Notes
(0013685)
Peter Felber   
14-01-2016 09:59   
I didn't find a requirement about the length of the certificate-chain in TS102940 or TS102941. Could it be possible that this is left open by the specification? In that case, we should assume a possible variable certificate length with more than 3 certificates.
(0013695)
Denis Filatov   
15-01-2016 13:45   
Actually this word has been used to refer to the certificate chain in the current message. This is a point to be removed from TPs. Already done in SND part.
(0013696)
Denis Filatov   
15-01-2016 13:48   
Agree with Peter. We shouldn't limit the max size of the chain.
Regarding the min size, it can not be less then 2 certs for the CAM profile, but who knows the future when new profile can come in?
(0014409)
Denis Filatov   
13-12-2016 13:17   
There is no clean requirements for the size of the chain in general. Anyway regions specification is the point of change in next spec version.