ETSI's Bug Tracker - Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language | |||||
View Issue Details | |||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
0006241 | Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language | Editorial | public | 01-08-2012 10:16 | 10-08-2012 11:28 |
Reporter | Tomas Urban | ||||
Assigned To | Ina Schieferdecker | ||||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
Platform | OS | OS Version | |||
Product Version | |||||
Target Version | v4.5.1 (published 2013-04) | Fixed in Version | v4.5.1 (published 2013-04) | ||
Clause Reference(s) | A.1.6.1.3 | ||||
Source (company - Author) | Elvior | ||||
Summary | 0006241: FieldSpec rule in the BNF | ||||
Description | The BNF rule 95 (FieldSpec) currently doesn't contain an option for leaving fields explicitely unspecified (described in the chapter 6.2). Therefore I propose to change the rule from: 95.FieldSpec ::= FieldReference AssignmentChar TemplateBody to 95.FieldSpec ::= FieldReference AssignmentChar (TemplateBody | Minus) | ||||
Steps To Reproduce | |||||
Additional Information | |||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Relationships | |||||
Attached Files | |||||
Issue History | |||||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change | ||
01-08-2012 10:16 | Tomas Urban | New Issue | |||
01-08-2012 10:16 | Tomas Urban | Clause Reference(s) | => A.1.6.1.3 | ||
01-08-2012 10:16 | Tomas Urban | Source (company - Author) | => Elvior | ||
08-08-2012 10:42 | Gyorgy Rethy | Status | new => assigned | ||
08-08-2012 10:42 | Gyorgy Rethy | Assigned To | => Ina Schieferdecker | ||
10-08-2012 11:28 | Ina Schieferdecker | Note Added: 0011022 | |||
10-08-2012 11:28 | Ina Schieferdecker | Status | assigned => closed | ||
10-08-2012 11:28 | Ina Schieferdecker | Resolution | open => fixed | ||
10-08-2012 11:28 | Ina Schieferdecker | Fixed in Version | => Edition 4.5.1 | ||
10-08-2012 11:28 | Ina Schieferdecker | Target Version | => Edition 4.5.1 |
Notes | |||||
|
|||||
|
|