ETSI's Bug Tracker - Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language
> *Sent: * 2008年8月26日 10:40
> *To: * Yang, Xiaoya; Sebek, Boguslaw Georges
> *Cc: * TSBSG17, ITU; PEPedit, ITU; Trabulsi, Sami; Ratta, Greg
> *Subject: * [ref9265E] ITU-T Recommendation Z.161 (13.11.2007)
> editorial problems
> *Importance: * High
>
> Any news ...
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> *From: * Gachet, Christelle [_mailto:Christelle.Gachet@itu.int_]
> *Sent: * jeudi, 3. juillet 2008 07:14
> *To: * Yang, Xiaoya; Sebek, Boguslaw Georges
> *Cc: * TSBSG17, ITU; PEPedit, ITU; Trabulsi, Sami; Ratta, Greg
> *Subject: * [ref9265E] ITU-T Recommendation Z.161 (13.11.2007)
> editorial problems
>
> Hello Xiaoya,
>
> 1) Clause 7, syntactical structure, a right parenthesis is missing:
> /SingleExpression/ |
> "{" { (/ FieldReference/ ":=" ( Expression | "-" ) [","] } "}" | //
> compound expression
> "{" [ { ( Expression | "-" ) [","] } ] "}"
> // compound expression
>
> 2) Clause 9.2, ,syntactical structure, should the vertical lines be
> placed after each instance? Same applies for clause 9.3
>
> *type** component*/ ComponentTypeIdentifier/ "{"
> { (/ PortInstance/
> |/ VarInstance/
> |/ TimerInstance/
> |/ ConstDef/ ) }
> "}"
>
> 3) Clause 21.1.1, 2nd paragraph after semantic description, there's a
> reference in parenthesis to clause 22.4. Is it the right one ?
>
> 4) Clause 21.2.5, syntactical structure, a left parenthesis is missing.
> Same applies for clauses 21.2.6 to 21.2.8
>
> 5) Clause 22.3.1, syntactical structure, there's an extra right square
> bracket. Is it ok ?
>
> 6) Table 20, is the heading of the table "Port operations" and not
> "Timer operations" ?
>
> 7) Clause 26.1, semantic description, is the reference to clause 27.1
> correct ?
>
> 8) Annex A, numbers were following in Z.140 (2006). In this version,
> each definition starts with an "1". Is it correct ?
>
> 9) Annexes D and E are informative. If we follow the ITU-T Guide,
> annexes are normative and Appendices are informative. Should these two
> annexes be renamed as Appendices I and II ?
>
> 10) Figure E3 is the same as Figure E.2. Could you provide the right one?
>
> Thanks
> Regards
>
RE ref9265E ITU-T Recommendation Z.161 (13.11.2007) editorial problems.htm (7,630) 09-09-2008 03:51http://oldforge.etsi.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=1629&type=bug