ETSI's Bug Tracker - IPv6 Testing Conformance (TTCN3 + TPs)
View Issue Details
0000002IPv6 Testing Conformance (TTCN3 + TPs)Test Case (TTCN3)public31-08-2006 13:0609-06-2016 16:04
user8 
Alexandre Berge 
normalminoralways
resolvedfixed 
0000002: TC_COR_8263_01 Unsolicited mulitcast RA
The requirement ( test case and test purpose ) is to check that the min time allowed between sending unsolicited multicast RA from the interface in
seconds MUST be no less than 3 seconds and no greater than 0.75*MaxRtrAdvInterval ( in case default is not the configured value ).
 
But in the test case and in the function f_TP_generateRouterAdvertisement_configuredMinRtrAdvInterval
the compared value expression is wrong..as they fall in in the range..2.85 seconds to some 3.15..or something
 
So the expression should be done for this
                 3 < minrtradvtinterval < 0.75*MaxRtrAdvInterval
 
This expression in the function f_TP_generateRouterAdvertisement_configuredMinRtrAdvInter
" if ( ( v_raDelay < ( PX_MIN_RTR_ADV_INTERVAL * ( 100.0 + PX_TIMER_PRECISION ) / 100.0 ) ) and
      ( v_raDelay > ( PX_MIN_RTR_ADV_INTERVAL * ( 100.0 - PX_TIMER_PRECISION ) / 100.0 ) ) ) {
"
should be replaced with
 
" if ( ( v_raDelay < ( PX_MAX_RTR_ADV_INTERVAL * ( 100.0 + PX_TIMER_PRECISION ) / 100.0 ) ) and
      ( v_raDelay > ( PX_MIN_RTR_ADV_INTERVAL * ( 100.0 - PX_TIMER_PRECISION ) / 100.0 ) ) ) {
"
No tags attached.
has duplicate 0000100resolved Alexandre Berge TC_COR_8263_01-Test Case logic for checking the time intervals is wrong 
Issue History
31-08-2006 13:06reporter_uNew Issue
31-08-2006 15:57user1Reporterreporter_u => user8
31-08-2006 15:57user1Category => Test Case
31-08-2006 17:46user10Statusnew => feedback
31-08-2006 17:46user10SummaryTC_COR_8263_01 => TC_COR_8263_01 Unsolicited mulitcast RA
31-08-2006 17:46user10Description Updated
22-09-2006 14:45user1Source (company - Author) => Huawey
07-11-2006 11:29Alexandre BergeStatusfeedback => assigned
07-11-2006 11:29Alexandre BergeAssigned To => Alexandre Berge
07-11-2006 15:21Alexandre BergeStatusassigned => resolved
07-11-2006 15:21Alexandre BergeFixed in Version => Next Release
07-11-2006 15:21Alexandre BergeResolutionopen => fixed
07-11-2006 15:21Alexandre BergeNote Added: 0000201
08-11-2006 10:02Alexandre BergeRelationship addedhas duplicate 0000100
12-09-2007 18:48user10Project@3@ => IPv6 Testing Conformance (TTCN3 + TPs)
01-06-2016 16:38Miguel A. ReinaCheckin
01-06-2016 16:38Miguel A. ReinaNote Added: 0013962
02-06-2016 08:34Miguel A. ReinaCheckin
02-06-2016 08:34Miguel A. ReinaNote Added: 0013963
09-06-2016 16:04Miguel A. ReinaCheckin
09-06-2016 16:04Miguel A. ReinaNote Added: 0013967

Notes
(0000201)
Alexandre Berge   
07-11-2006 15:21   
This 'if' statement is useless anyway...
Wrong behaviour 'RtAdv sent after 0.75*MaxRtrAdvInterval' is catched by '[] tc_maxRtrAdvInterval.timeout'.
Changed verdict to e_error and added log information in '[] tc_maxRtrAdvInterval.timeout'.
(0013962)
Miguel A. Reina   
01-06-2016 16:38   
Output from oneM2M Plugtests#2
U /trunk/ttcn/OneM2M_Functions.ttcn [^]
U /trunk/ttcn/OneM2M_Pixits.ttcn [^]
U /trunk/ttcn/OneM2M_Templates.ttcn [^]
U /trunk/ttcn/OneM2M_TestControl.ttcn [^]
U /trunk/ttcn/OneM2M_TestSystem.ttcn [^]
U /trunk/ttcn/OneM2M_Testcases.ttcn [^]
U /trunk/ttcn/OneM2M_Types.ttcn [^]
U /trunk/ttcn/OneM2M_TypesAndValues.ttcn [^]
(0013963)
Miguel A. Reina   
02-06-2016 08:34   
Output from oneM2M Plugtests#2 (part 2)
U /trunk/ttcn/OneM2M_Functions.ttcn [^]
U /trunk/ttcn/OneM2M_Testcases.ttcn [^]
U /trunk/ttcn/OneM2M_Types.ttcn [^]
(0013967)
Miguel A. Reina   
09-06-2016 16:04   
Output from oneM2M Plugtests#2 (part 3) - Handling of generation of addresses depending on the address format + selection of originator
U /trunk/ttcn/OneM2M_Functions.ttcn [^]
U /trunk/ttcn/OneM2M_Pixits.ttcn [^]
U /trunk/ttcn/OneM2M_Templates.ttcn [^]
U /trunk/ttcn/OneM2M_TestSystem.ttcn [^]
U /trunk/ttcn/OneM2M_Testcases.ttcn [^]
U /trunk/ttcn/OneM2M_Types.ttcn [^]