thank you for reviewing part 1. Please find below the answers.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dieter Hogrefe [mailto:hogrefe@informatik.uni-goettingen.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 11:25 AM
> To: Schieferdecker, Ina; "Gyo"rgy Re'thy (IJ/ETH)"; Jens Grabowski
> Subject: Re: [ref9265E] ITU-T Recommendation Z.161
> (13.11.2007) editorial problems
>
> Do we have a reply?
>
> BR, Dieter
>
> sebek@itu.int schrieb:
> > Dieter,
> >
> > I wonder if you have a reply now to the questions below.
> >
> > Georges
> >
> > _____________________________________________
> > *From: * Gachet, Christelle
> > *Sent: * 2008年8月26日 10:40
> > *To: * Yang, Xiaoya; Sebek, Boguslaw Georges
> > *Cc: * TSBSG17, ITU; PEPedit, ITU; Trabulsi, Sami; Ratta, Greg
> > *Subject: * [ref9265E] ITU-T Recommendation Z.161
> (13.11.2007)
> > editorial problems
> > *Importance: * High
> >
> > Any news ...
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > *From: * Gachet, Christelle [_mailto:Christelle.Gachet@itu.int_]
> > *Sent: * jeudi, 3. juillet 2008 07:14
> > *To: * Yang, Xiaoya; Sebek, Boguslaw Georges
> > *Cc: * TSBSG17, ITU; PEPedit, ITU; Trabulsi, Sami; Ratta, Greg
> > *Subject: * [ref9265E] ITU-T Recommendation Z.161
> (13.11.2007)
> > editorial problems
> >
> > Hello Xiaoya,
> >
> > 1) Clause 7, syntactical structure, a right parenthesis is missing:
> > /SingleExpression/ |
> > "{" { (/ FieldReference/ ":=" ( Expression | "-" ) [","] }
> "}" | //
> > compound expression
> > "{" [ { ( Expression | "-" ) [","] } ] "}"
>
> > // compound expression
> >
it should be
SingleExpression |
"{" { ( FieldReference ":=" ( Expression | "-" )) [","] } "}" | // compound expression
"{" [ { ( Expression | "-" ) [","] } ] "}" // compound expression
> > 2) Clause 9.2, ,syntactical structure, should the vertical lines be
> > placed after each instance? Same applies for clause 9.3
> >
> > *type** component*/ ComponentTypeIdentifier/ "{"
> > { (/ PortInstance/
> > |/ VarInstance/
> > |/ TimerInstance/
> > |/ ConstDef/ ) }
> > "}"
> >
there is no clause 9.3 - please see http://www.ttcn-3.org/StandardSuite.htm
I guess you work on v3.3.2? ETSI just released v3.4.1
the syntactical structure you refer to is in 6.2.10.1 - if you prefer to place the vertical lines after each instance, you can do so
> > 3) Clause 21.1.1, 2nd paragraph after semantic description,
> there's a
> > reference in parenthesis to clause 22.4. Is it the right one ?
> >
no, it should refer to "6.2.11 Component references"
> > 4) Clause 21.2.5, syntactical structure, a left parenthesis
> is missing.
> > Same applies for clauses 21.2.6 to 21.2.8
Indeed, a right parenthesis is too much
( VariableRef |
FunctionInstance |
any component |
all component ) "." alive
and similarily for the other three
> >
> > 5) Clause 22.3.1, syntactical structure, there's an extra
> right square
> > bracket. Is it ok ?
> >
I have:
Port "." call "(" TemplateInstance [ "," CallTimerValue ] ")"
[ to ( AddressRef | AddressRefList | all component ) ]
which looks alright.
> > 6) Table 20, is the heading of the table "Port operations" and not
> > "Timer operations" ?
indeed it should be timer operations
> >
> > 7) Clause 26.1, semantic description, is the reference to
> clause 27.1
> > correct ?
it should reference to "26.2 The Control part"
Please also note that the reference in a subsequent sentence should be corrected:
"The final verdict of a test case is calculated based on the final local verdicts of the different test components according to the rules defined in clause 24.1."
> >
> > 8) Annex A, numbers were following in Z.140 (2006). In this
> version,
> > each definition starts with an "1". Is it correct ?
I do not know what you mean
> >
> > 9) Annexes D and E are informative. If we follow the ITU-T Guide,
> > annexes are normative and Appendices are informative.
> Should these two
> > annexes be renamed as Appendices I and II ?
if that is the rule in ITU, please do so.
> >
> > 10) Figure E3 is the same as Figure E.2. Could you provide
> the right one?
it is attached - but this ok e.g. in v3.3.2 - could you please check that you work on the right version.
Thank you in advance for your support and best regards,
Ina
> >
> > Thanks
> > Regards
> >
>